您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 角膜后表面

角膜后表面

角膜后表面的相关文献在2004年到2022年内共计64篇,主要集中在眼科学、基础医学、药学 等领域,其中期刊论文59篇、会议论文2篇、专利文献287779篇;相关期刊19种,包括临床眼科杂志、眼科新进展、中华实验眼科杂志等; 相关会议1种,包括中国医师协会2012年眼科准分子激光角膜屈光手术学术研讨会暨第九届全国眼科准分子激光角膜屈光手术学术研讨会等;角膜后表面的相关文献由177位作者贡献,包括刘晓斌、宋海云、王雁等。

角膜后表面—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:59 占比:0.02%

会议论文>

论文:2 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:287779 占比:99.98%

总计:287840篇

角膜后表面—发文趋势图

角膜后表面

-研究学者

  • 刘晓斌
  • 宋海云
  • 王雁
  • 田芳
  • 胡琦
  • 褚仁远
  • 贺玲
  • 郑晓龙
  • 刘丽清
  • 刘磊
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

学科

年份

    • 任雁琳; 史春生; 姜波
    • 摘要: 目的:探究轻中度和高度近视患者飞秒激光制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)术后角膜前后表面和整体角膜高阶像差的变化.方法:对2018-12/2019-12在我院行FS-LASIK手术的近视患者129例129眼进行回顾性病例研究,按术前等效球镜度(SE)分为轻中度近视组(SE<-6.00D,76眼)和高度近视组(SE≥-6.00D,53眼).分别于术前和术后6mo用Pentacam眼前节分析系统测量角膜前后表面和整体角膜的高阶像差.结果:术后6mo,两组角膜前表面和整体角膜的总高阶像差、球差和水平彗差较术前增加,且高度近视组高于轻中度近视组(均P<0.01);两组角膜后表面的水平彗差较术前有差异(均P<0.01),且高度近视组高于轻中度近视组(P<0.01).两组患者角膜前表面和整体角膜的术源性总高阶像差、球差和水平彗差与术前SE有明显相关性(均P<0.01).结论:FS-LASIK术后6mo角膜前表面及整体角膜的总高阶像差、球差和水平彗差均较术前增加,且与术前SE明显相关;角膜后表面高阶像差除水平彗差外无明显变化,其远期变化有待进一步研究.
    • 景清荷; 唐雅婷; 钱东瑾; 卢奕; 蒋永祥
    • 摘要: 目的 分析高度近视并发白内障患者角膜后表面散光(PCA)及像差特征. 方法 采用回顾性研究设计.收集2014年9-12月复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院收治的白内障患者190例282眼,按眼轴长度(AL)分为高度近视组(AL≥26 mm)139眼和对照组(AL为20 ~ 25 mm)143眼.使用Pentacam测量角膜前后表面参数,包括平均角膜屈光力、中央角膜厚度、散光、像差等,并用IOL Master测量AL. 结果 高度近视组PCA值约为0.3 D(0~0.9 D),其中92.8%的散光值≤0.5D,以逆规散光(ATR)为主,占87.1%.高度近视组PCA值与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.797).高度近视组PCA值与角膜前表面散光(ACA)、角膜前表面像差、角膜前表面低阶像差、角膜后表面像差、角膜后表面高阶像差、角膜后表面低阶像差均呈正相关(r=0.235,P=0.005;r=0.217,P=0.010;r=0.229,P=0.007;r=0.395,P=0.000;r=0.243,P=0.004;r=0.384,P=0.000).以ACA估计总角膜散光(TCA),在前表面为顺规散光(WTR)时对65.67%的患眼高估(0.27±0.18)D,ATR时对88.10%的患眼低估(0.41±0.30)D,斜轴散光(Obl)时对63.33%的患眼低估(0.22±0.10)D.以角膜前表面像差值估计角膜总像差时,会对87.05%的患眼高估(0.275±0.176) μm,ACA类型对其无影响. 结论 高度近视眼中92.8%的PCA≤0.5D,以ATR为主.白内障术前选择人工晶状体(IOL)时,应该将PCA和像差值纳入考虑范围.%Objective This study was to investigate the characteristics of posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and aberration in cataract patients with high myopia.Methods A retrospective study was designed.Two hundred and eighty-two eligible eyes of 190 cataract patients were enrolled in Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University from September to December,2014.The eyes were classified into two groups according to axial length (AL):high myopia group with 139 eyes (AL≥26 mm) and control group with 143 eyes (AL was 20 to 25 mm).The mean keratometric mid-radius of curvature (Km),corneal central thickness (CCT),astigmatism and aberrations were measured by the rotating Scheimpflug System (Pentacam),and the AL were measured by the partial coherence interferometry (IOL Master).This study followed the Helsinki declaration,and was approved by the Ethic Committee of Eye and ENT Hospital,Fudan University.Informed consent was signed from each patient.Results In high myopia group,the mean PCA was 0.3 D (range 0 ~ 0.9 D) and 92.8% eyes had PCA values <0.5 D.The steep corneal meridian was aligned vertically (60°~ 120°) in 87.1% eyes for the posterior corneal surface.There was no significant difference in PCA between the high myopia group and the control group (P =0.797).Significant positive linear correlations was found between PCA and anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA),PCA and anterior corneal root mean square (RMS),PCA and anterior lower-order RMS,PCA and posterior corneal RMS,PCA and posterior high-order RMS,PCA and posterior lower-order RMS (r =0.235,P =0.005;r =0.217,P =0.010;r =0.229,P =0.007;r =0.395,P =0.000;r =0.243,P =0.004;r =0.384,P =0.000).Compared with total corneal astigmatism (TCA),anterior corneal measurements overestimated with-the-rule astigmatism (WTR) by a mean of (0.27 ± 0.18) D in 65.67% eyes,underestimated against-the-rule astigmatism (ATR) by (0.27 ± 0.18) D in 88.10% eyes and underestimated oblique astigmatism (Obl) by (0.22 ± 0.10) D in 63.33% eyes.Compared with total corneal aberrations,anterior corneal aberrations measurements overestimated by (0.275 ±0.176) μm in 87.05 % eyes,and the anterior corneal astigmatism types had no effect on the result.Conclusions In high myopia group,92.8% eyes had PCA values <0.5 D and the main astigmatism type in posterior corneal surface was ATR.The posterior corneal astigmatism and aberration were needed to consider in choosing intraocular lens (IOL) before cataract surgery.
    • 景清荷; 唐雅婷; 钱东瑾; 卢奕; 蒋永祥
    • 摘要: 目的分析高度近视并发白内障患者角膜后表面散光(PCA)及像差特征。方法采用回顾性研究设计。收集2014年9—12月复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院收治的白内障患者190例282眼,按眼轴长度(AL)分为高度近视组(AL≥26 mm)139眼和对照组(AL为20~25 mm)143眼。使用Pentacam测量角膜前后表面参数,包括平均角膜屈光力、中央角膜厚度、散光、像差等,并用IOL Master测量AL。结果高度近视组PCA值约为0.3 D(0~0.9 D),其中92.8%的散光值≤0.5 D,以逆规散光(ATR)为主,占87.1%。高度近视组PCA值与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.797)。高度近视组PCA值与角膜前表面散光(ACA)、角膜前表面像差、角膜前表面低阶像差、角膜后表面像差、角膜后表面高阶像差、角膜后表面低阶像差均呈正相关(r=0.235,P=0.005;r=0.217,P=0.010;r=0.229,P=0.007;r=0.395,P=0.000;r=0.243,P=0.004;r=0.384,P=0.000)。以ACA估计总角膜散光(TCA),在前表面为顺规散光(WTR)时对65.67%的患眼高估(0.27±0.18)D,ATR时对88.10%的患眼低估(0.41±0.30)D,斜轴散光(Obl)时对63.33%的患眼低估(0.22±0.10)D。以角膜前表面像差值估计角膜总像差时,会对87.05%的患眼高估(0.275±0.176)μm,ACA类型对其无影响。结论高度近视眼中92.8%的PCA≤0.5 D,以ATR为主。白内障术前选择人工晶状体(IOL)时,应该将PCA和像差值纳入考虑范围。
    • 朱冉; 程蕾; 龙克利; 顾明珠; 李全德
    • 摘要: 目的 分析飞秒激光LASIK术后角膜后表面变化和角膜前表面高阶像差变化.方法 选择我院于2014年2月至8月收治的52例(104眼)高度近视患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,各26例.两组患者均在本院行LASIK术,对照组接受传统术式,观察组给予飞秒激光辅助手术,比较两组患者术后高阶像差和角膜后表面高度变化.结果 观察组术后1个月鼻上、颞下、鼻下和角膜顶点的角膜后表面高度与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05).观察组术后3个月四个象限内及角膜顶点的角膜后表面高度与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均为P <0.05).观察组和对照组术后1个月、3个月的四个象限内及角膜顶点的角膜后表面高度比较,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05).观察组术后6个月彗差、初级球差显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05);观察组总高阶像差均方根值与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组和对照组总高阶像差均方根值、彗差、初级球差较术前均显著升高,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05).结论 飞秒激光辅助的LASIK术后角膜前表面高阶像差和角膜后表面高度变化相对较小,是一种理想的辅助LASIK技术.
    • 王世明; 李小萍; 顾林丹; 傅蒋伟
    • 摘要: 目的:使用Sirius眼前节分析仪测量飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后角膜后表面形态,并分析其影响因素。方法前瞻性非随机临床研究。73例(146眼)近视患者纳入本研究。其中,男35例,女38例。年龄19-36岁,平均(25.7±5.1)岁。等效球镜度(SE)-10.25--4.50 D,平均(-6.95±1.97)D。使用Sirius眼前节分析仪测量术前及术后1个月3、5、7 mm区域角膜后表面曲率。将术后1个月角膜后表面曲率变化值(ΔK)与切削百分比(AD/CT)、切削深度(AD)、残留基质厚度(RBT)及SE进行Pearson相关分析,并进一步采用逐步回归法对ΔK的影响因素行多元线性回归分析。结果术后1个月,3、5 mm直径区域角膜后表面曲率均比术前增加,差异有统计学意义(t=3.58、3.36,P〈0.01)。ΔK3 mm、ΔK5 mm、ΔK7 mm与AD/CT(r=0.845、0.833、0.753,P〈0.01)和AD(r=0.725、0.727、0.603,P〈0.05)呈正相关,而与SE (r=-0.762、-0.756、-0.674,P〈0.05)和RBT(r=-0.784、-0.733、-0.864,P〈0.01)呈负相关。多元线性回归分析发现AD/CT、RBT为ΔK3 mm的影响因素(β=2.048、-0.002,95%CI:0.489-3.607、-0.003-0,P〈0.1);AD/CT 为ΔK5 mm的影响因素(β=2.005,95%CI:1.068-3.942,P〈0.1);RBT、SE 为ΔK7 mm的影响因素(β=-0.003、-0.325,95%CI:-0.004-0.002、-0.786-0.428,P〈0.1)。结论飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后角膜后表面微量前凸,在保证手术效果的前提下,控制切削比,保留足量残留基质厚度,可以尽量避免术后角膜扩张、屈光回退等并发症的发生。
    • 王敏; 蔡劲峰; 芮燕君; 刘立森; 石昌盛; 董卫文
    • 摘要: 目的:比较飞秒激光小切口透镜取出术( small incision lenticule extraction, SMILE )与飞秒( laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)术后1a在泪膜稳定性与角膜生物力学稳定性等方面是否具有差异性。方法:选取2014-06/2015-07在我院行SMILE (43例86眼)与飞秒LASIK (47例94眼)的手术顺利且随访资料完整的患者,所有患者术前及术后1、6mo,1a均行平均泪膜破裂时间( average tear film break-up time,aBUT)、泪液分泌功能( SchirmerⅠtest,SⅠt)及Pentacam眼前节分析诊断仪等检查,比较并分析两种不同术式在术后1a泪膜及角膜生物力学稳定性方面是否存在差异。结果:两组患者术前一般资料无差异,术后平均随访时间为14±1.92mo。两组患者在术前和术后1mo时aBUT和SⅠt值无显著性差异;在术后6 mo和1 a时的aBUT值在两组间有差异性(P0.05)。结论:SMILE组术后远期在泪膜稳定性上优于飞秒Lasik组,两组患者术后远期在角膜生物力学稳定性方面未发现明显差异,均相对稳定。%•AIM: To investigate changes in tear film stability and corneal biomechanics after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction ( SMILE ) and femtosecond laser LASIK ( F-LASIK) for one year.•METHODS:A total of 43 patients (86 eyes) with SMILE and 47 patients ( 94 eyes ) with F-LASIK were chosen from Jun. 2014 to Jul. 2015, whose surgery all successfully and medical records were complete. Average tear film break-up time ( aBUT ) , Schirmer ▏test ( S▏t) and Pentacam were obtained before surgery and at 1, 6 and 12mo after surgery. The paired t-test were used to analyze the collected data.•RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, central corneal thickness ( CCT ) and optometry before surgery. The mean fellow time after surgery was ( 14 ± 1. 92 ) mo. The values of aBUT and S ▏ t was no significantly different in before surgery and 1mo after surgery. There was significantly different in aBUT between 2 groups in 6 and 12mo after surgery (P0. 05).•CONCLUTION:SMILE surgeries have superiority over F-LASIK in tear film stability. There is no change in corneal biomechanics, the posterior corneal surface is stable for long- term after SMILE or F-LASIK.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号