首页> 外文OA文献 >The Footballing Elephant in the Room? The Irish National Football Teams and Northern Players who declare for the Republic of Ireland
【2h】

The Footballing Elephant in the Room? The Irish National Football Teams and Northern Players who declare for the Republic of Ireland

机译:房间里的足球大象?宣布加入爱尔兰共和国的爱尔兰国家足球队和北方球员

摘要

Northern Ireland has struggled to achieve momentum for “toleration, respect and recognition” that would help the society move towards meaningful embedding of the “appropriate normative expectations associated with equal citizenship” (McBride, 2015, p. 249). The society remains divided even two decades after the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, as exemplified by the culture and practices that surround support for and endorsement of Ireland’s two ‘national’ football teams. Before the 1980s there appeared to be a greater separation of politics and Association Football in Northern Ireland, with the cross community support for the 1982 World Cup team serving as an example of that. In the late 1980s and early 90s football became increasingly politicised, with loyalist identity becoming synonymous with support Northern Ireland, and an increasingly confident Catholic population finding greater affiliation with the Republic of Ireland (Hassan, 2002). The Good Friday Agreement of 1998, though aspiring to harmonise identities (O’Neill, 2003), has potentially served to reinforce the concept of two distinct communities defined by their political and religious affiliations. On the surface level this appears to have created greater cultural and sporting divisions if analysing the situation through the pronouncements of public representatives on the Unionist side, and in so many young players of a Catholic background declaring adult allegiance to the Republic. However, at a deeper level, there appears to be a greater tolerance on the part of supporters with differing identities to recognise the achievements of the other side. Ultimately though, real harmony may only be attained when the symbols around football become less political and more neutral, in such areas as flags and anthems for example. There seems very little appetite for this though on any side, with each preferring to keep its own distinct identity rather than diluting them down to something more acceptable to those at the other end of the political spectrum.
机译:北爱尔兰一直在努力争取“宽容,尊重和认可”的势头,这将有助于社会朝着有意义地嵌入“与平等公民身份相关的适当规范性期望”的方向迈进(McBride,2015年,第249页)。在1998年的“耶稣受难日协议”签署后的二十年中,社会依然分裂,这体现在围绕支持和认可爱尔兰的两个“国家”足球队的文化和实践上。在1980年代以前,北爱尔兰的政治和协会足球之间似乎更加分离,以1982年世界杯足球赛的跨社区支持为例。在1980年代后期和90年代初,足球变得越来越政治化,忠诚的身份成为支持北爱尔兰的代名词,并且越来越有信心的天主教徒发现与爱尔兰共和国有更大的联系(Hassan,2002)。 1998年的《耶稣受难日协定》虽然希望统一身份(O'Neill,2003年),但可能会加强由政治和宗教派别定义的两个不同社区的概念。从表面上看,如果通过工会主义者方面的公共代表的宣布来分析局势,以及在这么多具有​​天主教背景的年轻球员宣布成年效忠共和国的情况下,这似乎造成了更大的文化和体育分歧。但是,从更深层次来看,具有不同身份的支持者对于承认对方的成就似乎具有更大的容忍度。但最终,只有在足球周围的符号变得不那么政治化而变得更加中立时,例如在旗帜和国歌等领域,才能实现真正的和谐。尽管从各个方面来看,这似乎都没有什么胃口,每个人都希望保持自己独特的身份,而不是将其稀释成政治上另一端更容易接受的东西。

著录项

  • 作者

    Breen P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号