首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the Governance of Sustainability Reporting: Assessing Mandatory and Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Policies and Practices Around the World
【2h】

Evaluating the Governance of Sustainability Reporting: Assessing Mandatory and Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Policies and Practices Around the World

机译:评估可持续发展报告的治理:评估全球强制性和自愿的可持续发展报告的政策和实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sustainability reporting (SR) is the practice of communicating environmental, social, and economic information and initiatives of a company (largely non-financial) to their stakeholders. This practice has been inspired by a variety of factors, including the recent threat of climate change, the financial crisis, and evolving governance models. There are many different policies being used around the world to implement SR. Some of these policies are voluntary, allowing the company to choose whether they report and what content to include. Others are more mandatory and government-regulated with specific requirements and various compliance mechanisms. Minimal research has been done on the governance of SR and the extent to which reports are achieving their policy goals. Through the creation of a sustainability scorecard, and a policy analysis of case countries, this study assesses if mandatory or voluntary standards are more effective for sustainability disclosures. Reports governed by mandatory legislation and reports under a voluntary standard are evaluated according to sustainability reporting criteria developed from semi-structured interview and literature themes. The countries studied are illuminated through a mapping analysis of SR policies, where the most mandatory-driven policy countries and the most voluntary-driven policy countries are used for the final assessment of effectiveness. This study provides structure to the complex policy mix, not only on the degree to which a policy is legally binding and mandatory, but also to its relative effectiveness to the developed criteria. The results of this study suggest that although the implementation method of mandatory or voluntary may not significantly impact reporting effectiveness at this time, mandatory countries score higher on most qualities on the sustainability reporting scorecard.
机译:可持续发展报告(SR)是一种向利益相关者传达公司的环境,社会和经济信息以及公司计划(主要是非财务计划)的实践。这种做法受到多种因素的启发,包括最近的气候变化威胁,金融危机和不断发展的治理模式。世界各地有许多不同的策略用于实施SR。其中一些政策是自愿的,使公司可以选择是否报告以及包括哪些内容。其他则更具强制性,并由政府监管,具有特定要求和各种合规机制。关于SR的治理以及报告实现其政策目标的程度的研究很少。通过创建可持续性计分卡和案例国家的政策分析,本研究评估强制性或自愿性标准对于可持续性披露是否更有效。受强制性法规管辖的报告和自愿性标准下的报告,均根据根据半结构化访谈和文献主题制定的可持续性报告标准进行评估。通过对SR政策的映射分析来阐明所研究的国家,在这些国家中,最强制性驱动的政策国家和最自愿性驱动的政策国家用于最终有效性评估。这项研究不仅为政策在法律上具有约束力和强制性的程度提供了结构,也为复杂的政策组合提供了结构,而且还提供了其与制定标准的相对有效性。这项研究的结果表明,尽管目前强制性或自愿性实施方法可能不会显着影响报告的有效性,但在可持续性报告记分卡上,强制性国家在大多数质量方面得分较高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Menzies Melissa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号