首页> 外文OA文献 >Status Competition Between the U.S. and China on the Stage of Africa
【2h】

Status Competition Between the U.S. and China on the Stage of Africa

机译:中美在非洲舞台上的地位竞争

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This case study traced the American reaction to Chinese activities in Africa from the year 2000 to the present. Two keys to understanding how this reaction might unfold were power-transition theory, which predicts that rising states will challenge the hegemon in an international system in order to revise the rules, and status-based competition theories.The U.S. appeared delayed in reacting to competition in Africa from its rising challenger there, China, until it understood that competition to be status-based. A clear, progressive reaction on the part of American leaders was traced. First, there was a split between the reactions of members of Congress and diplomats on-the-ground, who were concerned about China in Africa around the year 2005, and leaders in the White House and State Department, who publicly denied there was any kind of problem. White House and State Department leaders’ reaction then grew somewhat as relative gains concerns were activated by economic and power losses in Africa. These leaders then engaged in quiet diplomacy with China and Africa, perhaps to try to socialize China and to moderate its less favorable activities. The U.S. at this time did not seem to be fully aware of the status threat China was presenting.However, in about 2011, the U.S. appears to have begun to perceive the status losses it had sustained in Africa. Through policy changes, discourse, summitry and public diplomacy, including social media, leaders launched what appeared to be a public campaign, designed to position the U.S. as opposed to the values of China, and as a better partner for Africans. This can be seen as status competition because the U.S. had little to gain economically in Africa and its domestic public remained unconcerned with Africa. Loss of status appears to have motivated the U.S. to take action when nothing else had, inspiring policy changes vis-a-vis Africa, the first-ever U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit, two presidential trips to Africa, and a public diplomacy campaign designed to showcase American strengths.
机译:该案例研究追溯了2000年至今美国对中国在非洲活动的反应。理解这种反应可能如何发展的两个关键是权力转移理论,该理论预测崛起的国家将在国际体系中挑战霸权以修改规则,以及基于地位的竞争理论。从非洲的挑战者中国崛起,直到了解竞争是基于地位的。可以追溯到美国领导人作出了明确的,渐进的反应。首先,国会议员和实地外交官的反应存在分歧,他们在2005年左右对非洲的中国感到担忧,而白宫和国务院的领导人则公开否认有任何反应。问题。随后,由于非洲的经济和电力损失引发了对相对收益的担忧,白宫和国务院领导人的反应有所增强。然后,这些领导人与中国和非洲进行了安静的外交,也许是为了使中国社会化并缓和其不利的活动。美国当时似乎还没有完全意识到中国正在面临的地位威胁。然而,大约在2011年,美国似乎已经开始意识到它在非洲遭受的地位损失。领导人通过政策变化,言论,首脑会议和包括社会媒体在内的公共外交,发起了一场看似公开的运动,旨在使美国定位于反对中国的价值观,并成为非洲人更好的伙伴。这可以看作是地位竞争,因为美国在非洲的经济利益微乎其微,而且其国内公众仍然对非洲不关心。地位的丧失似乎促使美国采取了其他措施,采取了行动,鼓舞了针对非洲的政策变化,有史以来第一次美非领导人峰会,两次总统访问非洲,以及旨在解决这一问题的公共外交运动展示美国的优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leon Vanessa C;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号