首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in the APPROACH trial (assessment on the prevention of progression by Rosiglitazone on atherosclerosis in diabetes patients with cardiovascular history)
【2h】

Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in the APPROACH trial (assessment on the prevention of progression by Rosiglitazone on atherosclerosis in diabetes patients with cardiovascular history)

机译:在APPROACH试验中评估支架内再狭窄(评估罗格列酮对有心血管病史的糖尿病患者预防动脉粥样硬化进展的评估)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractTo determine (1) the medium-term effect of rosiglitazone and glipizide on intra-stent neointima hyperplasia, (2) restenosis pattern as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease. A total of 462 patients with T2DM were randomized to rosiglitazone or glipizide for up to 18 months in the APPROACH trial, and had evaluable baseline and follow-up IVUS examinations. There was no significant difference in the size of plaque behind stent between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups at 18 months among those treated with a bare metal stent (-5.6 mm 3 vs. 1.9 mm 3; P = 0.61) or with a drug-eluting stent (12.1mm 3 vs. 5.5 mm 3; P = 0.09). Similarly, there was no significant difference in percentage intimal hyperplasia volume between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups at 18 months among those treated with a bare metal stent (24.1% vs. 19.8%; P = 0.38) or with a drug-eluting stent (9.8% vs. 8.3%; P = 0.57). QCA data (intra-stent late loss, intra-stent diameter stenosis or binary restenosis) were not different between the rosiglitazone and glipizide groups. This study suggests that both rosiglitazone and glipizide have a similar effect on neointimal growth at medium term follow-up, a finding that warrants investigation in dedicated randomized trials.
机译:要确定(1)罗格列酮和格列吡嗪对支架内新内膜增生的中期效果,(2)通过血管内超声(IVUS)和定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)评估的T2DM和冠心病患者的再狭窄模式。在APPROACH试验中,总共462例T2DM患者被随机分配至罗格列酮或格列吡嗪长达18个月,并且具有可评估的基线和随访IVUS检查。罗格列酮组和格列吡嗪组在18个月时,使用裸金属支架治疗的患者(-5.6 mm 3 vs. 1.9 mm 3; P = 0.61)或药物洗脱的支架后的斑块大小没有显着差异。支架(12.1mm 3 vs. 5.5 mm 3; P = 0.09)。同样,在裸露金属支架(24.1%vs. 19.8%; P = 0.38)或药物洗脱支架(9.8)治疗的患者中,罗格列酮组和格列吡嗪组在18个月内膜增生百分率之间无显着差异。 %与8.3%; P = 0.57)。罗格列酮组和格列吡嗪组之间的QCA数据(支架内晚期丢失,支架内直径狭窄或二进制再狭窄)没有差异。这项研究表明,罗格列酮和格列吡嗪在中期随访中对新内膜生长具有相似的作用,这一发现值得在专门的随机试验中进行研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号