首页> 外文OA文献 >Heightened hurricane surge risk in northwest Florida revealed from climatological-hydrodynamic modeling and paleorecord reconstruction
【2h】

Heightened hurricane surge risk in northwest Florida revealed from climatological-hydrodynamic modeling and paleorecord reconstruction

机译:佛罗里达州西北部的飓风飓风风险增加,从气候 - 流体动力学模型和古地理重建中得出

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Historical tropical cyclone (TC) and storm surge records are often too limited to quantify the risk to local populations. Paleohurricane sediment records uncover long-term TC activity, but interpreting these records can be difficult and can introduce significant uncertainties. Here we compare and combine climatological-hydrodynamic modeling (including a method to account for storm size uncertainty), historical observations, and paleohurricane records to investigate local surge risk, using Apalachee Bay in northwest Florida as an example. The modeling reveals relatively high risk, with 100 year, 500 year, and “worst case” surges estimated to be about 6.3 m, 8.3 m, and 11.3 m, respectively, at Bald Point (a paleorecord site) and about 7.4 m, 9.7 m, and 13.3 m, respectively, at St. Marks (the head of the Bay), supporting the inference from paleorecords that Apalachee Bay has frequently suffered severe inundation for thousands of years. Both the synthetic database and paleorecords contain a much higher frequency of extreme events than the historical record; the mean return period of surges greater than 5 m is about 40 years based on synthetic modeling and paleoreconstruction, whereas it is about 400 years based on historical storm analysis. Apalachee Bay surge risk is determined by storms of broad characteristics, varies spatially over the area, and is affected by coastally trapped Kelvin waves, all of which are important features to consider when accessing the risk and interpreting paleohurricane records. In particular, neglecting size uncertainty may induce great underestimation in surge risk, as the size distribution is positively skewed. While the most extreme surges were generated by the uppermost storm intensities, medium intensity storms (categories 1–3) can produce large to extreme surges, due to their larger inner core sizes. For Apalachee Bay, the storms that induced localized barrier breaching and limited sediment transport (overwash regime; surge between 3 and 5 m) are most likely to be category 2 or 3 storms, and the storms that inundated the entire barrier and deposited significantly more coarse materials (inundation regime; surge > 5 m) are most likely to be category 3 or 4 storms.
机译:历史热带气旋(TC)和风暴潮记录通常太有限,无法量化对当地居民的风险。古飓风沉积物记录揭示了长期的TC活动,但是解释这些记录可能很困难,并且可能会带来很大的不确定性。在这里,我们以佛罗里达州西北部的阿帕拉切湾为例,比较并结合了气候-水动力模型(包括解决风暴大小不确定性的方法),历史观测资料和古飓风记录,以调查当地的浪涌风险。该模型显示相对较高的风险,在秃头点(古记录点)的100年,500年和“最坏情况”波涌分别估计为6.3 m,8.3 m和11.3 m,大约7.4 m,9.7分别位于圣马克斯(海湾的首长)的1米和13.3 m,这支持了根据古记录的推论,阿帕拉切湾经常遭受严重的洪水侵袭了数千年。综合数据库和古记录都包含比历史记录高得多的极端事件发生频率。根据综合模拟和古构造,大于5 m的浪涌的平均回报期约为40年,而根据历史风暴分析,平均回报期约为400年。阿帕拉切湾涌浪风险是由特征广泛的风暴决定的,在该地区的空间变化很大,并受沿海被困的开尔文波的影响,所有这些都是访问风险和解释古飓风记录时要考虑的重要特征。特别是,忽略大小不确定性可能会导致浪涌风险的严重低估,因为大小分布呈正偏斜。尽管最大风暴潮是由最高风暴强度产生的,但中等强度风暴(类别1-3)由于其较大的内芯尺寸而可能产生大到极端的风暴。对于阿帕拉奇湾,引起局部屏障突破和有限的泥沙输送(过冲状态; 3到5 m之间的浪涌)的风暴最有可能属于2或3类风暴,并且淹没整个屏障并显着更加粗糙的风暴物质(淹没状态;浪涌> 5 m)最有可能属于3级或4级风暴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号