首页> 外文OA文献 >The effects of power type resistance training on golf driver club head speed
【2h】

The effects of power type resistance training on golf driver club head speed

机译:动力型阻力训练对高尔夫球杆头部速度的影响

摘要

Resistance training for golf performance has grown in popularity as golfers are seeking increases in driving distance to combat longer golf courses. Various gym based interventions are employed within golf, with flexibility, rehabilitation, hypertrophic and strength type protocols being integrated by strength and conditioners. Currently, the vast majority of golf specific resistance training programs consist of hypertrophic type training parameters yet the effects of maximal power type training remain unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this thesis was to investigate the question: What are the effects of power type training on the club head speed (CHS) of professional male golfers?Four separate investigations were undertaken within this thesis. First, a review of the current literature pertaining to resistance training in golf was performed. The literature review identified several key outcomes. Firstly, it was evident that the golf swing is an explosive movement in which maximal velocity is obtained in a relatively short period of time. Secondly, cross sectional data supported the inclusion of power training within golf conditioning as increasing explosive muscular force capabilities likely increases CHS. However, such a methodology had not been previously utilised in a longitudinal research design. Finally, it was apparent that rapid force production and rotational ability should be targeted and thus tracked over a conditioning period. In light of this need, we sought to include two novel methods of assessments; the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) performed with chain fixation and the cable down swing.Prior to the inclusion of adapted or new testing methods into academic research reliability of the method is warranted. As such, chapter two sought to determine the reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force (PF), and early impulse at predetermined time brackets (0-30, 0-50, 0-100, 0-200) using the new chain fixation method. Ten participants were recruited for the purpose of test-retest reliability and were assessed over three separate occasions (separated by a minimum 3 days, max 7 days). It was concluded that all kinetic variables were reliable when IMTP chain fixation was used (ICC = 0.85 – 0.98, CV = 3.29% – 4.02%, CM = - 6.17 – 3.54%). As such this novel method was included into study four to determine pre to post changes in muscular force expression.In addition to the IMTP force measures it was concluded that a golf specific rotational assessment was warranted as no such assessment existed in the current literature. Therefore, a cable downswing (CDS) load velocity spectrum was proposed as a novel assessment of golf specific rotational velocity. As such Chapter 4 aimed to quantify the test-retest reliability of the CDS load velocity spectrum. Ten elite golfers were recruited and participated in three separate testing occasions (separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum 7 days). Following data analysis velocity at all loads (1.25 – 18.75kg) were observed to be extremely reliable (ICC = 0.70 – 0.97, CV = 1.5% – 6.4%, CM = -5.1% – 2.9%). Thus the CDS load velocity spectrum was included in the thesis as a method of quantifying change in rotational velocity over a longitudinal conditioning period.During Chapter 5, two high performance professional golfers were recruited to take part in a six week intervention investigating the effects of maximal power resistance type training on golf driver CHS. Due to the intensive tournament and travel schedules of professional golfers, a single subject research design was chosen for this investigation. Three pre intervention baseline measures of neuromuscular performance (IMTP and CDS load – velocity spectrum) and two golf specific baseline measures (CHS and accuracy) were taken over a 10 day period. In addition, the post intervention measures of neuromuscular performance were collected on three occasions across 10 days to establish if real changes occurred over the course of the intervention. Golf CHS was assessed at two pre intervention intervals and two post intervention time points.Following the six-week training intervention, both participants were observed to have substantially increased CHS (P1 = 3.1%, P2 = 3.9%, > ± 2SD) and had trended towards greater accuracy as depicted by visually interpreted statistics. However, no substantial change in kinetic variables occurred during IMTP testing with the exception of early impulse. Furthermore, CDS velocity increased through all assessed loads (P1 = 5.2 – 20.1%, P2 = 14.0 – 17.6%, > ± 2SD). Thus, the training study provided evidence that maximal power training is an effective means to increase CHS in highly trained and experienced professional golfers. However, in light of the lack of definitive increase in IMTP kinetics it is possible that Olympic movements are possibly too complex to elicit a training effect in such a short intervention. In conclusion, the current thesis provides evidence that power training within golf is a valid method of increasing CHS. In addition, increasing rotational velocity should be a primary focus within golf specific strength and conditioning. As limited improvements in isometric kinetic outputs were observed, decisive conclusions on the impact the training intervention had on lower (i.e. IMTP) body kinetics cannot be made.
机译:随着高尔夫球手寻求增加击球距离以对抗更长的高尔夫球场,用于高尔夫球表现的阻力训练已变得越来越流行。高尔夫中采用了各种基于体育馆的干预措施,通过力量和调节剂将柔韧性,康复能力,肥厚性和力量类型协议结合在一起。当前,绝大多数高尔夫特定阻力训练程序由肥大型训练参数组成,但是最大力量型训练的效果仍然未知。因此,本文的目的是研究以下问题:力量型训练对职业男性高尔夫球手的杆头速度(CHS)有何影响?本文进行了四项单独的研究。首先,对有关高尔夫阻力训练的现有文献进行了回顾。文献综述确定了几个关键结局。首先,很明显,高尔夫挥杆是一种爆炸​​性运动,其中在相对较短的时间段内获得了最大速度。其次,横截面数据支持在高尔夫球训练中包括力量训练,因为增加爆发力可能会增加CHS。但是,这种方法先前并未用于纵向研究设计中。最后,很明显,应该针对快速的力产生和旋转能力,并在调节期间内对其进行跟踪。鉴于这种需求,我们试图包括两种新颖的评估方法;等距大腿内侧牵引(IMTP)进行链条固定和缆索向下摆动。在将改进的或新的测试方法纳入学术研究之前,必须确保该方法的可靠性。因此,第二章试图确定等距大腿中部牵引力(IMTP)峰值力(PF)的可靠性,以及使用预定时间段(0-30、0-50、0-100、0-200)的早期冲动的可靠性新的链条固定方法。为了重测信度,招募了10名参与者,并在3个不同的场合(至少3天,最多7天)进行了评估。结论是,使用IMTP链固定时,所有动力学变量都是可靠的(ICC = 0.85 – 0.98,CV = 3.29%– 4.02%,CM =-6.17 – 3.54%)。因此,这项新方法被纳入研究四,以确定肌肉力量表达的前后变化。除了IMTP力量测量方法外,还得出结论,高尔夫特定的旋转评估是有必要的,因为当前文献中尚无这种评估。因此,提出了缆索下降(CDS)载荷速度谱,作为对高尔夫球比转速的一种新颖评估。因此,第4章旨在量化CDS负载速度谱的重测可靠性。招募了十名精英高尔夫球手,并参加了三个单独的测试场合(间隔最少3天,最多7天)。根据数据分析,在所有负载(1.25 – 18.75kg)下的速度都非常可靠(ICC = 0.70 – 0.97,CV = 1.5%– 6.4%,CM = -5.1%– 2.9%)。因此,CDS载荷速度谱作为一种量化纵向调节过程中旋转速度变化的方法包括在论文中。在第5章中,招募了两名高性能职业高尔夫球手参加为期六周的干预,以研究最大运动的影响。高尔夫球手CHS的功率阻力型训练。由于职业高尔夫球手的紧张比赛和旅行计划,本研究选择了一个主题研究设计。在10天的时间内,采取了三项神经肌肉性能的干预前基线测量(IMTP和CDS负荷-速度谱)和两项针对高尔夫的特定基线测量(CHS和准确性)。此外,在10天之内的3次中收集了神经肌肉性能的干预后测量值,以确定在干预过程中是否发生了真正的变化。在干预前的两个时间间隔和干预后的两个时间点对高尔夫CHS进行了评估,在进行为期六周的培训干预后,观察到两个参与者的CHS均显着增加(P1 = 3.1%,P2 = 3.9%,>±2SD)并且视觉解释的统计数据显示,趋势趋于更高的准确性。但是,在IMTP测试期间,除了早期冲动外,动力学变量没有发生实质性变化。此外,在所有评估的负载下CDS速度都增加了(P1 = 5.2 – 20.1%,P2 = 14.0 – 17.6%,>±2SD)。因此,训练研究提供了证据,即最大力量训练是增加训练有素和经验丰富的职业高尔夫球手的CHS的有效手段。但是,鉴于IMTP动力学缺乏明确的提高,奥林匹克运动可能太复杂而无法在如此短的时间内引起训练效果。结论目前的论文提供了证据,证明高尔夫内的力量训练是增加CHS的有效方法。另外,增加旋转速度应该是高尔夫球的特定强度和调节范围内的主要焦点。由于观察到等距动力学输出的改善有限,因此无法得出有关训练干预对较低(即IMTP)身体动力学的影响的决定性结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schofield Mike Trevor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号