首页> 外文OA文献 >Interferon-β and interferon-λ signaling is not affected by interferon-induced refractoriness to interferon-α in vivo
【2h】

Interferon-β and interferon-λ signaling is not affected by interferon-induced refractoriness to interferon-α in vivo

机译:干扰素-β和干扰素-λ信号传导不受干扰素诱导的干扰素-α体内耐药性的影响

摘要

Therapy of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon alpha (pegIFN-alpha) and ribavirin achieves sustained virological responses in approximately half of the patients. Nonresponse to treatment is associated with constitutively increased expression of IFN-stimulated genes in the liver already before therapy. This activation of the endogenous IFN system could prevent cells from responding to therapeutically injected (peg)IFN-alpha, because prolonged stimulation of cells with IFN-alpha induces desensitization of the IFN signal transduction pathway. Whether all types of IFNs induce refractoriness in the liver is presently unknown. We therefore treated mice with multiple injections and different combinations of IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, and IFN-lambda. Pretreatment of mice with IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, and IFN-lambda induced a strong expression of the negative regulator ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18 in the liver and gut. As a result, IFN-alpha signaling was significantly reduced when mice where reinjected 16 hours after the first injection. Surprisingly, both IFN-beta and IFN-lambda could activate the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway and the expression of IFN-stimulated genes despite high levels of ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18. IFN-lambda treatment of human liver biopsies ex vivo resulted in strong and maintained phosphorylation of STAT1, whereas IFN-alpha-induced STAT1 activation was transient. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the action of IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, and IFN-lambda signaling in the liver does not become refractory during repeated stimulation of the IFN signal transduction pathway. The sustained efficacy of IFN-beta and IFN-lambda could be an important advantage for the treatment patients who are nonresponders to pegIFN-alpha, through a preactivated endogenous IFN system.
机译:聚乙二醇化干扰素α(pegIFN-α)和利巴韦林对慢性丙型肝炎的治疗在大约一半的患者中实现了持续的病毒学应答。对治疗无反应与在治疗前肝中IFN刺激基因的组成性表达增加有关。内源性IFN系统的这种激活可以防止细胞对治疗性注射的(peg)IFN-α作出反应,因为用IFN-α长时间刺激细胞会诱导IFN信号转导途径的脱敏。目前尚不清楚所有类型的IFN是否在肝脏中诱导难治性。因此,我们用多次注射和IFN-α,IFN-β,IFN-γ和IFN-λ的不同组合治疗了小鼠。用IFN-α,IFN-β和IFN-λ预处理的小鼠在肝脏和肠道中诱导了负调节剂泛素特异性肽酶18的强烈表达。结果,在第一次注射后16小时再次注射小鼠时,IFN-α信号转导显着降低。出乎意料的是,尽管泛素特异性肽酶18的水平很高,但IFN-β和IFN-λ都可以激活Janus激酶信号转导子和转录激活子(STAT)通路以及IFN刺激基因的表达。肝活检离体导致STAT1的强烈和维持磷酸化,而IFN-α诱导的STAT1激活是短暂的。结论:与IFN-α,IFN-β和IFN-λ信号的作用相反,肝脏在重复刺激IFN信号转导途径期间不会变得难治。 IFN-β和IFN-λ的持续疗效可能是通过预激活的内源性IFN系统对pegIFN-α无反应的患者的重要优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号