This research concerns the application of the Probability Density Function (PDF) on Large Eddy Simulations (LES) of turbulent reacting flows in a wide range of open flame configurations spanning between the premixed and non-premixed regime. The aim is to validate the applicability of the PDF model on a wide range of flames without any special treatment. Additionally, the extit{a-posteriori} Chemical Exposive Mode Analysis (CEMA) has been applied to the results in order to examine the flame structure and identify locations of extinction, re-ignition, etc. Four different series of flames are studied, each one of them belonging to a completely different combustion regime.ududThe F1-F3 premixed turbulent flames is the first family of flames where the PDF method is applied. The LES-PDF model is shown to accurately predict the flow field and the scalar field even on a very coarse grid. The simulations were performed on a personal computer, so the computational power was severely restricted. Nevertheless, the PDF model was able to give accurate predictions, so one of the flames was chosen for a further sensitivity analysis. A large number of modelling parameters were studied and the results show little sensitivity to them in contrast to RANS-PDF approaches in premixed flames. Finally, the model is able to capture large scale quenching at qualitatively the correct extinction speed.ududThe Cambridge-Sandia series of swirling stratified flames was also examined. It encompasses a wide range of flames with various combinations of swirl and stratification ratio levels. Four distinct cases were selected and tested. For the most simple flames (SwB1 and SwB5), the model gives excellent prediction for both the flow field and the scalar distribution. The introduction of the additional fields improves slightly the results, especially at locations further away from the nozzle exit. For the flames which exhibit more complex flow fields and complex characteristics (SwB6 and SwB11), the model gives reasonable results, given the complexity of the flow field. The introduction of differential diffusion and heat losses towards the ceramic cap was studied independently on the SwB11 flame and was found to have counteracting effects. Therefore, their combination was tested and was found to give a significant improvement.ududThe next series of flames is the Sydney Swirl flames. The SM1 and SM2 flames are two complex swirling flames with a difficult flow field to capture. The field is composed of recirculating zones and vortex break-down bubble areas. The SM2 has not been tested in the literature and this work is the first modelling approach. The flow field simulation results are reasonable, given the complexity of the flame. The biggest discrepancies are observed close to the nozzle exit. The Chemical Explosive Mode Analysis is also performed to give information about the flame structure. The flame is divided into three distinct zones with the second one being a very large quenching region. The CEMA analysis explains why the flame does not quench, but re-ignites further down.ududFinally, the Delft III premixed flame is studied, a difficult flame to model as it shows quenching with large extinction pockets despite the moderately low Reynolds number. The major flow characteristics were accurately captured by the simulation and the introduction of the additional stochastic fields improves the results close to the nozzle exit. Contrary to most researchers that model the pilot flow as a single heat source close to the nozzle exit, in this work the pilot flow is modelled as a separate flow stream, something that increased the complexity of the simulations due to the extremely thin pilot rim which was comparable to the cell size. Nevertheless, the model was able to accurately capture the localized extinction throughout the flame and the application of the Chemical Explosive Mode Analysis gave further insight into the structure of the flame.
展开▼
机译:这项研究涉及概率密度函数(PDF)在湍流反应流的大涡模拟(LES)中的应用,该湍流在宽范围的预混合和非预混合状态下的明火配置中产生。目的是在不进行任何特殊处理的情况下,验证PDF模型在多种火焰中的适用性。此外,结果还应用了 textit {a-posteriori}化学暴露模式分析(CEMA),以便检查火焰结构并确定熄灭,重燃等位置。研究了四种不同系列的火焰, ud udF1-F3预混湍流火焰是使用PDF方法的第一类火焰。 LES-PDF模型显示出即使在非常粗糙的网格上也可以准确预测流场和标量场。由于仿真是在个人计算机上进行的,因此计算能力受到严重限制。但是,PDF模型能够给出准确的预测,因此选择了其中一个火焰进行进一步的灵敏度分析。研究了许多建模参数,与预混火焰中的RANS-PDF方法相比,结果显示出对它们几乎没有敏感性。最后,该模型能够以正确的熄灭速度定性捕获大规模淬火。 ud ud还检查了剑桥-桑迪亚系列漩涡状分层火焰。它涵盖了范围广泛的火焰,具有旋流和分层比率水平的各种组合。选择并测试了四个不同的案例。对于最简单的火焰(SwB1和SwB5),该模型可以很好地预测流场和标量分布。引入其他场会稍微改善结果,尤其是在远离喷嘴出口的位置。对于表现出更复杂的流场和复杂特性的火焰(SwB6和SwB11),考虑到流场的复杂性,该模型给出了合理的结果。在SwB11火焰上独立研究了向陶瓷帽引入微分扩散和热量损失,并发现它们具有抵消作用。因此,对它们的组合进行了测试,发现有明显的改进。 ud ud下一个系列的火焰是Sydney Swirl火焰。 SM1和SM2火焰是两个复杂的旋流火焰,难以捕获流场。该场由再循环区和涡旋分解气泡区组成。 SM2尚未在文献中进行过测试,这项工作是第一种建模方法。考虑到火焰的复杂性,流场模拟结果是合理的。在靠近喷嘴出口处观察到最大的差异。还执行化学爆炸模式分析以提供有关火焰结构的信息。火焰分为三个不同的区域,第二个区域是非常大的淬火区域。 CEMA分析解释了为什么火焰没有淬火,而是再次点燃的原因。 ud ud最后,研究了代尔夫特(Delft)III预混火焰,很难建模,因为尽管雷诺数适中,但火焰熄灭的区域很大。通过仿真可以准确地捕获主要的流量特性,并且通过引入其他随机场可以改善靠近喷嘴出口的结果。与大多数将先导流建模为靠近喷嘴出口的单一热源的研究人员相反,在这项工作中,先导流被建模为单独的流,这由于极薄的先导边缘而增加了模拟的复杂性。与细胞大小相当。然而,该模型能够准确地捕获整个火焰的局部消光,化学爆炸模式分析的应用进一步了解了火焰的结构。
展开▼