首页> 外文OA文献 >Business identity theft under the UDRP and the ACPA: is bad faith always bad for business advertising?
【2h】

Business identity theft under the UDRP and the ACPA: is bad faith always bad for business advertising?

机译:UDRP和ACPA下的商业身份盗用:恶意对商业广告是否总是有害?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Websites have provided a very strong platform for businesses to reach their customers. They surpass the regular billboards by providing portals through which transactions are conducted without any physical contacts between a seller and a buyer. This usefulness underscores the importance of domain names through which websites are navigated. Cybersquatters have in bad faith targeted or hijacked domain names of famous and reputable businesses exploiting the goodwill of these names and misleading customers and other internet users. This paper explores the construction of bad faith under both the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy and the US Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. The paper argues that, despite some inconsistencies, 'bad faith' elements have been broadly interpreted to embrace various activities of cybersquatters. It cautions that an overzealous application of the instruments may stifle freedom of speech.
机译:网站为企业吸引客户提供了非常强大的平台。通过提供进行交易的门户,买卖双方之间没有任何实际联系,它们超越了常规的广告牌。这种有用性强调了通过网站导航域名的重要性。域名抢注者恶意利用这些名称的信誉,误导客户和其他互联网用户,将目标对准或劫持了著名和信誉良好的企业的域名。本文探讨了《统一争端解决政策》和《美国反抢注消费者保护法》下的恶意构建。该论文认为,尽管存在一些矛盾之处,但“恶意”要素已被广泛地解释为包含抢注者的各种活动。它警告说,过度使用乐器可能会扼杀言论自由。

著录项

  • 作者

    Faturoti Bukola;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号