首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of spatial plant-soil feedback heterogeneity on plant performance in monocultures
【2h】

Effects of spatial plant-soil feedback heterogeneity on plant performance in monocultures

机译:空间植物-土壤反馈异质性对单一栽培植物性能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1. Plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects have almost exclusively been quantified on homogeneous soils, but as different plant species will influence their local soil differently in reality PSF effects will be spatially heterogeneous. Whether plant performance in soils with spatially heterogeneous PSF can be predicted from pot experiments with homogeneous soils is unclear. 2. In a greenhouse experiment we tested the response of monocultures of six grassland species (two grasses, two legumes, and two forbs) to three spatially explicit treatments (fine-grain heterogeneity, coarse-grain heterogeneity, and homogeneous). Sixteen patches of conditioned soil (~6x6 cm) were placed within each container. For homogeneous treatments all patches contained the same conditioned soil within a container. The fine-grained heterogeneous treatment contained four differently conditioned soils that were applied following a Latin square design, while for the coarse-grained heterogeneous treatment four contiguous square blocks of four cells each were created in each container. 3. In general species grew worse on soil conditioned by conspecifics. However, when the biomass production on all homogeneous soil treatments (own and foreign soils) was averaged and compared to the heterogeneous treatments, we found that biomass production was lower than expected in the heterogeneous soils. This effect of heterogeneity depended on both the conditioning and test species, but most heterogeneity effects were negative. The grain of the heterogeneity (coarse vs. fine: at the chosen spatial scale) did not affect plant performance. 4. We hypothesize that a more diverse soil community is present in spatially heterogeneous soils. This increases i) the chance of plants to encounter its antagonists, which may then rapidly increase in numbers; and ii) the scope for synergistic co-infections. Together this may lead to non-additive responses of plants to spatial heterogeneity in PSF. 5. Synthesis. Plant performance was lower in spatially heterogeneous soils than predicted by spatially homogeneous soils. In natural grasslands that have mixed plant communities conditioning the soil plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects on plant performance may therefore be more negative than what is predicted from pot experiments. Our results emphasise the need to incorporate the spatial dynamics of PSF both in empirical and modelling studies if we are to understand the role of PSF in plant-plant interactions and plant community dynamics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
机译:1.植物-土壤反馈(PSF)效应几乎只能在均质土壤上进行量化,但实际上,由于不同的植物物种对当地土壤的影响不同,因此PSF效应在空间上是异质的。目前尚不清楚是否可以通过盆栽实验来预测具有空间异质PSF的土壤中的植物生长性能。 2.在温室实验中,我们测试了六个草原物种(两个草,两个豆类和两个草)的单种栽培对三种空间明确处理(细粒异质性,粗粒异质性和均质性)的响应。在每个容器中放置16块条件土壤(〜6x6 cm)。对于均质处理,所有贴剂都在容器中包含相同的条件土壤。细粒异质处理包含四种不同条件的土壤,这些土壤是按照拉丁方的设计施加的,而对于粗粒异质处理,则在每个容器中分别创建四个单元的四个连续正方形块。 3.一般而言,在以特定物种为条件的土壤上,物种生长较差。但是,将所有均质土壤处理(本国土壤和异国土壤)的生物量生产平均后,与非均质处理相比,我们发现非均质土壤的生物量生产低于预期。这种异质性效应取决于条件和测试物种,但大多数异质性效应均为负值。异质性的谷物(粗粒与细粒:在选定的空间尺度上)不影响植物生长。 4.我们假设空间异质性土壤中存在更多样化的土壤群落。这增加了:i)植物遇到其拮抗剂的机会,其数量可能迅速增加; ii)协同合并感染的范围。总之,这可能导致植物对PSF中空间异质性的非加性响应。 5.合成。在空间非均质土壤中的植物性能低于在空间均质土壤中的预测。因此,在混合了植物群落的天然草地中,土壤植物-土壤反馈(PSF)对植物生长的影响可能比盆栽试验所预测的更为负面。我们的结果强调,如果我们要了解PSF在植物-植物相互作用和植物群落动态中的作用,则需要在经验研究和模型研究中纳入PSF的空间动力学。本文受版权保护。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号