首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis and evaluation of the teat-end vacuum condition in different automatic milking systems
【2h】

Analysis and evaluation of the teat-end vacuum condition in different automatic milking systems

机译:不同自动挤奶系统中奶头真空状态的分析与评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The number of automatic milking systems (AMSs) installed worldwide shows anincreasing trend. In comparison to the preliminary models, new versions employ moresophisticated sensor technology than ever before. The originally developed AMSs werecharacterised by larger vacuum fluctuations and vacuum reductions than conventionalmilking systems. The objective of this study was to find out whether this situationstill holds or if an improvement has occurred. The vacuum behaviour at the teat endof an artificial teat during simulated milking was measured in a study that involveddifferent AMS types (AMS A, B and C). Each system was tested over a range of flowrates (0.8 to 8.0 L/min). The wet-test method was used and teat-end vacuum behaviourwas recorded. At a flow rate of 4.8 L/min, the lowest vacuum fluctuation (6.4 kPa inb-phase) was recorded for AMS A, while the lowest vacuum reduction (3.5 kPa in theb-phase) was obtained for AMS B. AMS C yielded higher values for vacuum reductionand vacuum fluctuation. Consequently, it was concluded that AMS A and B, in terms ofconstruction and operational setting (vacuum level), are more appropriate than AMSC. Nevertheless, high values for vacuum reduction or fluctuation have a negative effecton the teat tissue. Hence, one of the future challenges in milk science is to develop acontrol system that is able to allow fine adjustments to the vacuum curve at the teatend.
机译:全球安装的自动挤奶系统(AMS)数量呈增长趋势。与初步模型相比,新版本采用了比以往更先进的传感器技术。最初开发的AMS具有比常规挤奶系统更大的真空波动和真空降低的特点。这项研究的目的是找出这种情况是否仍然存在或是否已经有所改善。在一项涉及不同AMS类型(AMS A,B和C)的研究中,测量了人工挤奶过程中人造奶头的奶头真空度。每个系统都在一定范围的流量(0.8至8.0 L / min)上进行了测试。使用湿法测试并记录乳头端真空行为。在4.8 L / min的流速下,AMS A的真空波动最低(6.4 kPa inb相),而AMS B的真空降低最低(b k相为3.5 kPa)。AMSC的收率更高真空降低和真空波动的值。因此,得出的结论是,就结构和操作环境(真空水平)而言,AMS A和B比AMSC更合适。然而,高的真空度降低或波动值对乳头组织有负面影响。因此,牛奶科学的未来挑战之一是开发一种能够对奶头真空度曲线进行精细调整的控制系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号