首页> 外文OA文献 >Knowledge ownership, its influencing factors, and the relationships with knowledge sharing intentions in organisations : a comparative study between Thailand and the UK
【2h】

Knowledge ownership, its influencing factors, and the relationships with knowledge sharing intentions in organisations : a comparative study between Thailand and the UK

机译:知识所有权,其影响因素以及与组织中知识共享意图的关系:泰国与英国的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ownership is an innate perception of individuals which could manifest in their possessive behaviours. Owners of property are inclined to extend a sense of self to their possessions, demand a right to control them and use them as a tool with which to interact or negotiate with other people. Clarifying ownership of knowledge is difficult in terms of whether the knowledge in question should belong to an individual following privacy rights or it should belong to an organisation following intellectual property rights (IPR). Furthermore, conflicts occur between developed countries which have a stronger culture for the IPR than developing countries do. Studying knowledge ownership helps to understand these differing viewpoints. Previous works found that knowledge ownership influences the intentions to share knowledge. Nevertheless, little research has been done to explore the knowledge ownership concept particularly in a cross-cultural context. This thesis suggests that cross-cultural research is an appropriate approach to conduct a study on knowledge ownership because ownership perceptions vary from cultures to cultures. The work of Ekweozor (2008) is extended in this study to include a comparative study between the UK and Thailand to validate previous findings. Furthermore, knowledge ownership concept, its influencing factors and its relationship with knowledge sharing intentions are examined. Secondary data in the UK context were adopted from Ekweozor (2008)'s work. The Thai version questionnaires translated from her English version were distributed to collect data in the Thai context. The results show that knowledge sharing intentions vary according to types of ownership perception which include individual, organisational and collaborative ownership. Employees who perceive organisational ownership tend to have more intention to share knowledge than the others. In contrast, employees who perceive individual ownership tend to have less intention to share knowledge than the others. In addition, the results reveal that contextual factors including nationality and sector, and conditional factors including types of knowledge, the work environment and personal characteristics, influence what individuals believe about knowledge ownership. Moreover, apart from the mediating role, it is found that knowledge ownership also has a moderating role between the work environment and knowledge sharing intentions. It should be noted that the study was conducted only in the UK and Thailand thus it may not be able to generalise to other countries. Despite this limitation, this study emphasises that knowledge ownership perception is a crucial factor that influences knowledge sharing intentions in organisations. In addition, knowledge ownership could mediate and moderate the relationship between the work environment and knowledge sharing intentions. It is also recommended that contextual factors should be considered when conducting a study on knowledge ownership perceptions because each context differs in many respects such as cultures, regulations and the work environment. Therefore, in order to strengthen and validate research findings in this area, cross-cultural research is an important strategy. Overall, this study theoretically and practically contributes to and advances knowledge of knowledge ownership by providing empirical evidences and implications for researchers and practitioners in a cross-cultural context.
机译:所有权是对个人的一种先天感知,可以体现在他们的所有格行为中。财产所有人倾向于将自我意识扩展到他们的财产中,要求拥有控制这些财产的权利,并将其用作与他人互动或谈判的工具。就所讨论的知识应属于遵循隐私权的个人还是应属于遵循知识产权(IPR)的组织而言,很难明确知识的所有权。此外,在发达国家之间发生了冲突,这些国家拥有比发展中国家更强的知识产权文化。学习知识所有权有助于理解这些不同的观点。先前的工作发现,知识所有权会影响知识共享的意图。然而,很少进行研究来探索知识所有权的概念,尤其是在跨文化的背景下。本文认为,跨文化研究是进行知识所有权研究的一种合适方法,因为所有权认知因文化而异。 Ekweozor(2008)的工作在本研究中得到扩展,包括英国和泰国之间的比较研究,以验证以前的发现。此外,还研究了知识所有权的概念,影响因素及其与知识共享意图的关系。英国的二级数据来自Ekweozor(2008)的工作。分发了从她英文版本翻译过来的泰文问卷,以收集泰文环境中的数据。结果表明,知识共享的意图根据所有权感知类型的不同而不同,包括个人,组织和协作所有权。拥有组织所有权的员工比其他员工更倾向于共享知识。相比之下,认为个人拥有所有权的员工倾向于比其他人更少分享知识。此外,结果表明,包括国籍和行业在内的情境因素以及包括知识类型,工作环境和个人特征在内的条件因素都会影响个人对知识所有权的看法。此外,除了中介作用外,还发现知识所有权在工作环境和知识共享意图之间也起调节作用。应当指出的是,该研究仅在英国和泰国进行,因此可能无法推广到其他国家。尽管有此限制,但本研究强调知识所有权感知是影响组织中知识共享意图的关键因素。此外,知识所有权可以调解和调节工作环境与知识共享意图之间的关系。还建议在进行知识所有权认知研究时应考虑上下文因素,因为每种上下文在许多方面都存在差异,例如文化,法规和工作环境。因此,为了加强和验证该领域的研究成果,跨文化研究是一项重要策略。总体而言,这项研究在跨文化背景下为研究人员和从业人员提供了经验证据和启示,从理论上和实践上都有助于并提高知识所有权的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号