首页> 外文OA文献 >Транскультурна освіта як імператив глобального суспільстваud(Transcultural Education as an Imperative of Global Society)
【2h】

Транскультурна освіта як імператив глобального суспільстваud(Transcultural Education as an Imperative of Global Society)

机译:跨文化教育是全球社会的当务之急(跨文化教育是全球社会的当务之急)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Сучасний контекст формування глобального суспільства формує соціокультурні виклики для освіти. Як навчитися жити в мультикультурному світі в умовах зростаючої глобалізації, інтеграції та інформаційної революції, яка примножує відмінності? Який концепт культури може бути підставою для трансформації освіти та гуманітарної політики в цілому? У статті розглядається динаміка осмислення культури в концептах окремих культур, інтеркультурності, мультикультурності і транскультурності. Робиться висновок про дескриптивну та нормативну релевантність концепту транскультурності для формування освітньої стратегії глобального суспільства.ud(Today the world is becoming more global, transnational and inter-related. Global mainstreams, interacting withudlocal particularity, create a complex network of new glocal reality interdependence. Information and communicationsudrevolution creates conditions for widespread «border crossing» – the transgression of the barriers of paradigms, rationalities,social and cultural integrity; a transversal thinking is taking shape, aimed at creating «bridges» and transitions between differences, connecting, but not reducing them to a common.udContemporary context of a global society creates socio-cultural challenges for education. How to learn to live in a multicultural world in the face of increasing globalization, integration and information revolution, which multiplies the difference?udWhat is the concept of culture can be the basis for the transformation of education and humanitarian policy in general?udOur understanding of culture is an active factor in our cultural life. In this sense, the «reality» culture to a great extent is a consequence of our cultural concepts. Therefore we must assume the concepts that are not only descriptively adequate, but regulatory acceptable, and which pragmatically form the desired horizons of the future.udCurrently in the field of theoretical understanding of culture and to determine the goals and objectives of education, we can distinguish the following concepts, which compete with each other: the classical concept of single cultures, the concepts of interculturality and multiculturality and transcultural concept.udThe traditional concept of single cultures is characterized by three elements: by social homogenization, ethnic consolidation and intercultural delimitation. All three elements of this traditional concept have become untenable today.udAt the end of the twentieth century the concepts of intercultural and multicultural nature have become popular, especially as applied to education. But are they able to provide an appropriate concept of today’s cultures? They apparently try to overcome some flaws of the traditional concept by advocating a mutual understanding of different cultures.udYet they are, almost as inappropriate as the traditional concept itself, because they still conceptually presuppose it.udWhat is called for today is a departure from this concept and to think of cultures beyond the contraposition of «ownness» and «foreignness» – beyond both the heterogeneous and the own. Cultures de facto no longer have the insinuatedudform of homogeneity and separateness. They have instead assumed a new form, which is to be called transculturaludinsofar that it passes through classical cultural boundaries. Cultural conditions today are largely characterized by mixes and permeations. The concept of transculturality seeks to articulate this altered cultural constitution. It is the most adequate concept of culture today – for both descriptive and normative reasons. The concept of transculturality sketches a different picture of the relation between cultures. Not one of isolation and of conflict, but exchange and interaction.udThus the strategy of educational policy should be built through an appeal to the concept of transculturality.)
机译:当前全球社会形成的背景决定了教育的社会文化挑战。面对日益扩大的全球化,融合和信息革命,如何学习生活在多元文化的世界中?什么样的文化概念可以成为整个教育和人道主义政策转变的基础?本文考虑了在个体文化,跨文化性,多元文化主义和跨文化主义概念中理解文化的动力。结论是,跨文化性概念对全球社会教育战略形成具有描述性和规范性意义。 Ud(当今世界正变得越来越全球化,跨国化和相互联系。全球主流与 udlocal特殊性相互作用,创建了一个新的glocal现实的复杂网络信息和通讯革命为广泛的“边界跨越”创造了条件-跨越范式,理性,社会和文化完整性的障碍;正在形成一种横向思维,旨在创造“桥梁”以及差异之间的过渡,联系 ud全球社会的当代语境给教育带来了社会文化挑战。面对日益加剧的全球化,融合和信息革命,如何学习生活在多元文化的世界中,差异会倍增吗? ud文化的概念可以作为基础ud我们对文化的理解是我们文化生活中的一个积极因素。从这个意义上说,“现实”文化在很大程度上是我们文化观念的产物。因此,我们必须假设这些概念不仅在描述上足够,而且在法规上可以接受,并且务实地形成未来的理想视界。 Ud当前,在对文化的理论理解以及确定教育的目的和目标领域,我们可以区分以下相互竞争的概念:单一文化的古典概念,跨文化和多元文化的概念以及跨文化概念 ud单一文化的传统概念的特征在于三个要素:社会同质化,族裔整合和跨文化划界。这个传统概念的所有三个要素在今天变得站不住脚了。Ud在20世纪末,跨文化和多元文化本质的概念已经流行,尤其是在教育领域。但是他们能够提供当今文化的适当概念吗?他们显然试图通过倡导对不同文化的相互理解来克服传统观念的某些缺陷。 UdYes,尽管与传统观念本身一样,它仍然与传统观念本身一样不适当,因为它们仍然在概念上以其为前提。从这个概念出发,去思考超越“拥有性”和“外来性”对立的文化-超越异质性和自身性。实际上,文化不再具有同质和分离的暗示形式。他们取而代之的是采取一种新形式,即跨文化 udinsofar,它跨越了古典文化的边界。今天的文化条件主要是混合和渗透。跨文化性的概念试图阐明这种改变的文化构成。出于描述性和规范性原因,它是当今最适当的文化概念。跨文化性的概念勾勒出文化之间关系的另一幅图景。 UdThus因此,教育政策的策略应通过呼吁跨文化性的概念来构建。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号