首页> 外文OA文献 >Recall error and recall bias in life course epidemiology
【2h】

Recall error and recall bias in life course epidemiology

机译:回忆生命历程流行病学中的错误和回忆偏差

摘要

OBJECTIVES I propose a distinction between recall error and recall bias and examine the the effect of childhood financial hardship on adult health, subject to such recall problems. Studying the effect of childhood hardship on adult health is a prototypical investigation in life course studies where both non-clinical factors and long-duration processes are at play in determining health outcome. These factors and processes are often elicited retrospectively. Unfortunately, retrospective information on childhood hardship is often subject to recall error and recall bias. There is surprisingly little methodological work on how to purge their effects in retrospective life course studies. METHODS I recast a variant of generalised latent variable models as covariate error measurement model to purge recall error in life course study. Additionally, I recast the endogeneous treatment model as a solution to the problem of recall bias. I apply both models to examine the effect of childhood financial hardship on adult health status of more than 359,000 European respondents from 23 countries. In addition, I validate the solutions using the National Child Development Study cohort where both prospective and restrospective information are available. RESULTS Childhood financial hardship has a strong effect on adult health status. Once recall error is accounted for in a generalised latent variable model, the effect reduced by an order of magnitude though remain statistically significant. Applying the endogeneous treatment model of recall bias suggests that childhood hardship is systematically misreported by respondents. Once this bias is purged, the effect of childhood deprivation on adult health increased markedly. Such an increase is consistent with multiple direct and indirect pathways linking childhood hardship and adult health. CONCLUSION Problems of recall error and recall bias are common in life course retrospective studies. Applied to data from 23 European countries, the proposed solutions recover the effect of childhood hardship on adult health outcome.
机译:目标我提出召回错误和召回偏见之间的区别,并研究儿童财务困难对成年人健康的影响,并应对此类召回问题。研究儿童时期的苦难对成人健康的影响是生命过程研究中的原型研究,其中非临床因素和长期过程都在影响健康结果的确定。这些因素和过程通常是追溯性的。不幸的是,有关童年苦难的回顾性信息经常会出现回忆错误和回忆偏见。令人惊讶的是,在回顾性生命历程研究中,很少有方法学研究如何清除其影响。方法我重塑了广义潜变量模型的一种变体,作为协变量误差测量模型,以清除生命历程研究中的召回误差。此外,我重铸了内生性治疗模型,以解决召回偏见的问题。我使用这两种模型研究了来自23个国家/地区的超过359,000名欧洲受访者的童年财务困境对成人健康状况的影响。此外,我使用“全国儿童发展研究”队列验证了解决方案,该队列既有前瞻性信息又有回顾性信息。结果童年的财务困难对成人健康状况有很大影响。一旦在广义潜变量模型中考虑了召回误差,尽管影响在统计上仍显着,但其影响降低了一个数量级。应用回忆偏倚的内生性治疗模型表明,受访者系统地误报了儿童期的困难。一旦消除了这种偏见,儿童剥夺对成人健康的影响就会明显增加。这种增加与将儿童的困难和成人的健康联系在一起的多种直接和间接途径是一致的。结论回忆错误和回忆偏见的问题在生命过程回顾研究中很常见。拟议的解决方案应用于来自23个欧洲国家的数据,恢复了童年时期的苦难对成人健康结果的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tampubolon Gindo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号