首页> 外文OA文献 >From parallelogram to tower? Texts-Contexts-Paratexts. A Study of the Hamsun Center in a document theory perspective
【2h】

From parallelogram to tower? Texts-Contexts-Paratexts. A Study of the Hamsun Center in a document theory perspective

机译:从平行四边形到塔?文本 - 上下文,副文本。从文献论角度研究汉姆森中心

摘要

The focus of attention of this thesis is the paratext (Genette, Seuils, 1987). In Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (1997) Genette advances his theory on the role of paratexts in the elaboration of a book. He shows how “every context serves as a paratext” and foresees in the end that the concept can be extended to other forms of artistic expression than the written text. The construction built for the Hamsun Center in Hamarøy seems to be a perfect example of the power of paratexts and “the illocutionary force of its message”. The first part of the study is a formal analysis of the notion of text in regard to the notion of paratext. Both building and content seem to be the result of contextual paratexts. The shape of the building at the Hamsun Center creates a paratext and questions the role of materiality and embodiment of ideas. Ephemeral or perennial character of exhibits and activities bear paratextual significance. Particularly, a new trend of exhibits is based on a “live” experience involving body and senses. The study, conducted at the Hamsun Center in Hamarøy in the summer and the fall of 2013, shows how the Center is perceived by the visiting public and how it compares to aims and expectations of conceivers and public. Mediation is another factor that can help measure the impact of paratexts. The role of paratexts in remediation serves as a further demonstration of their influence on the public as well as on the character and mode of their presentation. In the end, the remediation process redefines the Writing Space and helps consider a symbolic transfer from text to sign.The conclusion points out the underestimated coercive power of paratexts. Generally applied to the written text, the possibility to transfer a paratextual analysis to a three dimensional architectural artifact, refutes the idea of an “immutable character” to the notion of text as advanced by Genette.
机译:本论文关注的焦点是超文本(Genette,Seuils,1987)。吉内特(Genette)在《超文本:诠释的阈值》(1997)中提出了关于超文本在拟订书本中的作用的理论。他展示了“每个上下文都是一个超文本”,并预见了该概念可以扩展到除书面文本以外的其他形式的艺术表达。为哈马罗伊(Hamarøy)的哈姆森中心(Hamsun Center)建造的建筑似乎是超文本力量和“其信息的言外之力”的完美典范。研究的第一部分是对文本概念的超文本概念的形式分析。建筑和内容似乎都是上下文语境的结果。 Hamsun中心的建筑物形状创造了一个超文本,并质疑了重要性和思想体现的作用。展品和活动的短暂或常年特性具有超文本意义。特别是,展品的新趋势是基于涉及身体和感官的“现场”体验。这项研究于2013年夏季和秋季在哈马罗伊(Hamarøy)的哈姆森中心(Hamsun Center)进行,显示了来访公众如何看待该中心,以及如何将其与构思者和公众的目标和期望进行比较。调解是另一个有助于衡量超文本现象影响的因素。寄生文字在补救中的作用进一步证明了它们对公众的影响以及对它们呈现的特征和方式的影响。最后,补救过程重新定义了写作空间,并帮助考虑了从文本到符号的象征性转移。结论指出,超文本的强制性力量被低估了。通常用于书面文本的可能性,是将超文本分析转移到三维建筑工件上,这种可能性驳斥了Genette提出的“不变字符”这一思想。

著录项

  • 作者

    Faaland Maryline Sinniger;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号