首页> 外文OA文献 >Juror Typologies and DNA Comprehension:Who Benefits from Jury Trial Innovations?
【2h】

Juror Typologies and DNA Comprehension:Who Benefits from Jury Trial Innovations?

机译:陪审员类型和DNa理解:谁从陪审团审判创新中获益?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When DNA evidence is presented in the courtroom, it is typically accompanied by complex testimony conveying information such as the method of generating population frequencies, match criteria and probabilities, as well as laboratory errors and error rates. Although this evidence may have high probative value, the legal community has expressed growing concern regarding jurors’ ability to comprehend it. However, courts have implemented a variety of jury trial innovations to facilitate jurors’ ability to process complex information. Although these innovations may have a positive effect on comprehension of complex trial evidence, it is unclear whether some jurors are more likely to benefit from these aids than others, particularly in cases involving DNA evidence. The present research explores this issue using data originally by Dann, Hans, and Kaye (2003). Juror typologies are constructed to better understand how trial innovations contribute to juror comprehension and satisfaction in cases where DNA evidence is present.
机译:当DNA证据出现在法庭上时,通常伴随着复杂的证词传达信息,例如生成种群频率,匹配标准和概率的方法,以及实验室错误和错误率。尽管这些证据可能具有很高的证明价值,但法律界对陪审员的理解能力表示越来越关注。但是,法院已经实施了各种陪审团审判创新,以提高陪审员处理复杂信息的能力。尽管这些创新可能会对理解复杂的审判证据产生积极影响,但尚不清楚某些陪审员是否比其他陪审员更可能受益于这些帮助,特别是在涉及DNA证据的案件中。本研究使用Dann,Hans和Kaye(2003)最初的数据探讨了这个问题。陪审员类型学旨在更好地了解在存在DNA证据的情况下审判创新如何促进陪审员的理解和满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号