首页> 外文OA文献 >No More Freeways: Urban Land Use-Transportation Dynamics without Freeway Capacity Expansion
【2h】

No More Freeways: Urban Land Use-Transportation Dynamics without Freeway Capacity Expansion

机译:没有更多的高速公路:城市土地利用 - 没有高速公路扩容的交通动态

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Observations of the various limitations of freeway capacity expansion have led to a provocative planning and policy question – What if we completely stop building additional freeway capacity. From a theoretical perspective, as a freeway transportation network matures, there exists a saturation point beyond which any additional freeway capacity would only be counterproductive from a welfare point of view, and worsen the existing urban transportation problems. Traditional benefit/cost analysis of individual freeway capacity expansion projects often ignores long-term induced demand and land use changes and does not represent a systems approach to this important theoretical issue. From a practical perspective, a no-more-freeway policy can relieve transportation funds for other potentially more effective usages, such as improving urban arterial street system, improving transit level of service and coverage, implementing demand management and pricing strategies, and facilitating more efficient land use patterns (e.g. high density in-fill and transit-oriented developments). This research answers the following critical land use-transportation planning questions. Improved knowledge on these issues should benefit planers and decision-makers who pursue mobility and sustainability objectives and have the power to shape future cities.(1). Under what conditions will freeway capacity expansion become counterproductive to urban planning objectives (where is the saturation point)?(2). How will land use and transportation evolve under a “No-More-Freeway” policy?(3). What are the implications of such a policy on congestion, land use efficiency, transportation finance, and social welfare?(4). What is the impact of a less restrictive “No-More-Freeway” policy that only allows private-section freeway investments and relieves public-section freeway investments for other compelling transportation needs.The analysis in this project builds upon a modeling tool, ABSOLUTE, developed by the P.I. in previous research projects. ABSOLUTE is an Agent-Based Simulator Of Land Use-Transportation Evolution, which translates planning policies such as the “No-More- Freeway” policy into alternative urban growth paths and possibly urban growth equilibria (land use and transportation system equilibria). Due to the “Small Start” nature of this OTREC project, the analysis focuses primarily on stylized urban areas, and empirical analysis of the “No-More- Freeway” policy is only conducted for one policy scenario on the Twin Cities, MN, area.
机译:对高速公路通行能力扩展的各种限制的观察导致了一个挑衅性的规划和政策问题–如果我们完全停止建设更多的高速公路通行能力该怎么办。从理论上讲,随着高速公路交通网络的成熟,存在一个饱和点,超过这个饱和点,从福利的角度来看,任何额外的高速公路通行能力只会适得其反,并加剧现有的城市交通问题。单个高速公路通行能力扩展项目的传统收益/成本分析通常忽略了长期诱发的需求和土地用途的变化,并不代表针对这一重要理论问题的系统方法。从实践的角度来看,不再使用高速公路的政策可以为其他可能更有效的用途减轻运输资金的负担,例如改善城市主干道系统,改善服务和覆盖范围的过境水平,实施需求管理和定价策略以及促进更高效土地利用方式(例如高密度填土和以交通为导向的发展)。这项研究回答了以下关键的土地利用-运输规划问题。增强对这些问题的了解应使追求移动性和可持续性目标并有权塑造未来城市的规划者和决策者受益。(1)。在什么条件下高速公路的通行能力扩张会与城市规划目标(饱和点在哪里)起反作用?(2)。在“无高速公路”政策下土地使用和运输将如何发展?(3)。这项政策对交通拥堵,土地利用效率,运输融资和社会福利有何影响?(4)。限制性较小的“不准高速公路”政策的影响是什么,该政策仅允许私家路段高速公路投资,而放宽公共路段高速公路投资以满足其他迫切的交通需求。该项目中的分析基于建模工具ABSOLUTE由PI开发在以前的研究项目中。绝对是基于代理的土地利用-运输演变模拟程序,它将“无更多高速公路”政策等规划政策转化为替代性的城市增长路径,并可能转化为城市增长均衡(土地使用和运输系统均衡)。由于该OTREC项目具有“小规模启动”的性质,因此分析主要集中在风格化的城市地区,而“无更多高速公路”政策的实证分析仅针对明尼苏达州双子城地区的一种政策方案进行。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhang Lei; Xu We;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号