首页> 外文OA文献 >Russia’s Ostrich Approach to Climate Change and the Paris Agreement. CEPS Policy Insights No 2017/40, November 2017
【2h】

Russia’s Ostrich Approach to Climate Change and the Paris Agreement. CEPS Policy Insights No 2017/40, November 2017

机译:俄罗斯的鸵​​鸟气候变化方法和巴黎协议。 CEps政策见解2017年11月2017/40

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the latest information from Russia’s leading climate scientists, the country’s political leadership does not acknowledge the importance of anthropogenic factors in climate change. This is in stark contrast to most other governments, which recognise that there is no longer any doubt about the human origins of climate change.  Russia’s leadership has nevertheless acknowledged the negative nature of changes in the climate and noted the growing risks to Russian territory. It also emphasises the need for adaptation, in contrast to its previous tendency to dismiss such risks.  In the view of Russia’s leadership, the global economic trend recognised by the Paris Agreement will generate risks for the national economy, but only in the distant future. This interpretation leads to a delay in adopting robust measures for low-carbon development, and explains the focus on short-term energy efficiency measures. Russia’s GHG emissions target mainly reflects a business-as-usual approach to the development of energy efficiency.  The leadership relies on Russian prognoses that the global fossil-fuel era will continue for the foreseeable future, and ignores recent signals that would advocate phasing out coal and oil. Carbon regulation is already included as a policy tool to introduce new technologies, but is to be launched on an economy-wide scale only in the late 2020-30s. Russia’s main trading partners (China, Germany, Japan, Korea, India, and the Nordic countries) should communicate to Moscow, for example in bilateral meetings, BRICS, SCO and others, that climate change policies and regulations are being adopted by most countries, not least out of benign self-interest. In lagging behind now, Russia risks being unprepared for the post-fossil fuels era.
机译:尽管有俄罗斯主要的气候科学家提供了最新的信息,但该国的政治领导层并未承认人为因素在气候变化中的重要性。这与大多数其他国家的政府形成鲜明对比,其他大多数国家的政府都认识到对气候变化的人类起源已不再有任何疑问。 不过,俄罗斯领导人已经意识到气候变化的负面影响,并指出俄罗斯领土面临的风险日益增加。与以往消除这种风险的趋势相反,它也强调了适应的必要性。 在俄罗斯的领导下,《巴黎协定》所承认的全球经济趋势将为国民经济带来风险,但只有在不久的将来。这种解释导致在采用低碳发展的有力措施方面出现了延迟,并解释了对短期能源效率措施的关注。俄罗斯的温室气体排放目标主要反映了提高能效的常规做法。 领导层依靠俄罗斯的预言,认为全球化石燃料时代将在可预见的未来继续,并且无视最近提倡逐步淘汰煤炭和石油的信号。碳监管已经作为引入新技术的政策工具而包括在内,但仅在2020-30年代后期才在整个经济范围内启动。俄罗斯的主要贸易伙伴(中国,德国,日本,韩国,印度和北欧国家)应与莫斯科交流,例如在双边会议,金砖国家,上海合作组织和其他国家中,大多数国家正在采用气候变化政策和法规,至少出于良性的个人利益。在目前落后的情况下,俄罗斯有可能为后化石燃料时代做好准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号