首页> 外文OA文献 >Overcoming the Clash of Civilizations: EU Peace Strategies for Balkan Ethno-Sectarian Nationalist Conflicts
【2h】

Overcoming the Clash of Civilizations: EU Peace Strategies for Balkan Ethno-Sectarian Nationalist Conflicts

机译:克服文明冲突:巴尔干民族 - 宗派民族主义冲突的欧盟和平战略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[From the introduction]. This study focuses on trends in relationships between Serb and Bulgarian ethno-sectarian majorities and their respective, Muslim minorities within a dynamic international systemic context. It does not focus on the Kosovar and ethnic Albanian national minority case more broadly throughout the Balkans, partly because Kosovo has already achieved de facto and will soon achieve de jure separation from Serbia, and partly because of space limitations. More attention is on the Bulgarian case as an example of relatively successful conflict resolution. For comparison purposes, the Serbian case is the Sandzak, a historic region straddling Serbia and Montenegro which is home to a concentration of Slavophone Muslims. Serbian nationalism meanwhile continues to suffer setbacks along with the post Cold War decline of intensity of Great Power willingness to support it as an ally in Southeastern Europe. After the separation of Montenegro from the confederation of Serbia and Montenegro, and the imminent separation secession of Kosovo, the Sandzak region, along with the Presovo valley with its ethnic Albanian population, is most likely to be one within Serbia, together with Voivodina, to witness more demands for autonomy, if not outright secession to join Bosnia. Whereas Voivodina’s largest ethnic minority consists of Hungarians, the Muslims of the historic region of Sandzak (part of which lies in now-independent Montenegro) has an ethno-sectarian concentration of “Bosniaks.” They tend to self-identify with the neighboring Bosniaks with their capital in Sarajevo in Bosnia- Herzegovina to the point that their preferred name is “Bosniak.”
机译:[引言]。这项研究的重点是在动态的国际系统背景下,塞族和保加利亚族裔宗派多数群体及其各自的穆斯林少数群体之间的关系趋势。它不在整个巴尔干地区更广泛地关注科索沃和阿尔巴尼亚族裔少数人案件,部分原因是科索沃已经实现了事实上的,即将在法律上与塞尔维亚分离,部分是因为空间有限。作为解决冲突相对成功的一个例子,保加利亚的案例得到了更多的关注。为了进行比较,塞尔维亚的案例是Sandzak,这是一个历史悠久的地区,横跨塞尔维亚和黑山,这里集中了许多Slavophone穆斯林。与此同时,随着冷战后大国支持其作为东南欧盟友的意愿减弱,塞尔维亚民族主义继续遭受挫折。在黑山脱离塞尔维亚和黑山联邦之后,以及科索沃即将分离的分裂之后,桑扎克地区以及普雷索沃山谷及其阿尔巴尼亚族裔人口很可能是塞尔维亚境内的一个地区,与沃沃季第纳州一起见证了更多的自治要求,即使不是直接分裂加入波斯尼亚。 Voivodina最大的少数民族由匈牙利人组成,而历史悠久的Sandzak(部分地区位于现在独立的黑山共和国)的穆斯林则在族裔派系中集中了“ Bosniaks”。他们倾向于与邻近的波斯尼亚人(他们的首都位于波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的萨拉热窝)进行自我识别,以至于他们的首选名字是“波斯尼亚克”。

著录项

  • 作者

    DeDominicis Benedict E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号