首页> 外文OA文献 >Engaging Terminally Ill Patients in End of Life Talk : How Experienced Palliative Medicine Doctors Navigate the Dilemma of Promoting Discussions about Dying
【2h】

Engaging Terminally Ill Patients in End of Life Talk : How Experienced Palliative Medicine Doctors Navigate the Dilemma of Promoting Discussions about Dying

机译:让终末病患者参与生命终结谈话:经验丰富的姑息医学医生如何驾驭推动死亡讨论的两难选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective To examine how palliative medicine doctors engage patients in end-of-life (hereon, EoL) talk. To examine whether the practice of “eliciting and responding to cues”, which has been widely advocated in the EoL care literature, promotes EoL talk. Design Conversation analysis of video- and audio-recorded consultations. Participants Unselected terminally ill patients and their companions in consultation with experienced palliative medicine doctors. Setting Outpatient clinic, day therapy clinic, and inpatient unit of a single English hospice. Results Doctors most commonly promoted EoL talk through open elaboration solicitations; these created opportunities for patients to introduce–then later further articulate–EoL considerations in such a way that doctors did not overtly ask about EoL matters. Importantly, the wording of elaboration solicitations avoided assuming that patients had EoL concerns. If a patient responded to open elaboration solicitations without introducing EoL considerations, doctors sometimes pursued EoL talk by switching to a less participatory and more presumptive type of solicitation, which suggested the patient might have EoL concerns. These more overt solicitations were used only later in consultations, which indicates that doctors give precedence to patients volunteering EoL considerations, and offer them opportunities to take the lead in initiating EoL talk. There is evidence that doctors treat elaboration of patients’ talk as a resource for engaging them in EoL conversations. However, there are limitations associated with labelling that talk as “cues” as is common in EoL communication contexts. We examine these limitations and propose “possible EoL considerations” as a descriptively more accurate term. Conclusions Through communicating–via open elaboration solicitations–in ways that create opportunities for patients to volunteer EoL considerations, doctors navigate a core dilemma in promoting EoL talk: giving patients opportunities to choose whether to engage in conversations about EoL whilst being sensitive to their communication needs, preferences and state of readiness for such dialogue.
机译:目的探讨姑息医学医生如何让患者参与临终关怀(EoL)讨论。检查在EoL护理文献中广泛提倡的“引起和响应提示”的做法是否促进了EoL谈话。视频和音频录制咨询的设计会话分析。参加者未选择的绝症患者和他们的同伴与经验丰富的姑息医学医生进行磋商。设置一个英式临终关怀的门诊,日间治疗诊所和住院单元。结果医生最常通过公开的精心招揽来促进EoL对话;这些为患者创造了机会,使他们可以以医生没有公开询问EoL问题的方式来介绍EoL,然后再进一步阐明。重要的是,避免精心设计的措辞避免了假设患者有EoL问题。如果患者在不提出EoL要求的情况下对开放式详细招标做出了回应,则医生有时会通过改用参与性较低和推定性较高的招标方式进行EoL对话,这表明患者可能会担心EoL。这些更公开的邀请仅在以后的咨询中使用,这表明医生优先考虑自愿考虑EoL的患者,并为他们提供了机会来发起EoL对话。有证据表明,医生将精心设计患者的谈话作为吸引他们参与EoL对话的资源。但是,将谈话标记为“线索”存在一些限制,这在EoL通信上下文中很常见。我们研究了这些局限性,并提出了“可能的EoL注意事项”作为描述上更准确的术语。结论通过公开交流,通过为患者创造自愿参加EoL讨论的机会,医生可以进行沟通,以促进EoL谈话的核心困境:为患者提供机会选择是否就EoL进行对话,同时对自己的交流需求保持敏感,偏好和准备进行此类对话的状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号