首页> 外文OA文献 >Engaging terminally ill patients in end of life talk: How experienced palliative medicine doctors navigate the dilemma of promoting discussions about dying
【2h】

Engaging terminally ill patients in end of life talk: How experienced palliative medicine doctors navigate the dilemma of promoting discussions about dying

机译:让临终患者参加生命终结演讲:经验丰富的姑息医学医生如何应对促进关于死亡的讨论的难题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective:udTo examine how palliative medicine doctors engage patients in end-of-life (hereon, EoL) talk. To examine whether the practice of “eliciting and responding to cues”, which has been widely advocated in the EoL care literature, promotes EoL talk.ududDesign:udConversation analysis of video- and audio-recorded consultations.ududParticipants:udUnselected terminally ill patients and their companions in consultation with experienced palliative medicine doctors.ududSetting:udOutpatient clinic, day therapy clinic, and inpatient unit of a single English hospice.ududResults:udDoctors most commonly promoted EoL talk through open elaboration solicitations; these created opportunities for patients to introduce Ð then later further articulate Ð EoL considerations in such a way that doctors did not overtly ask about EoL matters. Importantly, the wording of elaboration solicitations avoided assuming that patients had EoL concerns. If a patient responded to open elaboration solicitations without introducing EoL considerations, doctors sometimes pursued EoL talk by switching to a less participatory and more presumptive type of solicitation, which suggested the patient might have EoL concerns. These more overt solicitations were used only later in consultations, which indicates that doctors give precedence to patients volunteering EoL considerations, and offer them opportunities to take the lead in initiating EoL talk.udThere is evidence that doctors treat elaboration of patients’ talk as a resource for engaging them in EoL conversations. However, there are limitations associated with labelling that talk as “cues” as is common in EoL communication contexts. We examine these limitations and propose “possible EoL considerations” as a descriptively more accurate term.ududConclusions:udThrough communicating Ð via open elaboration solicitations Ð in ways that create opportunities for patients to volunteer EoL considerations, doctors navigate a core dilemma in promoting EoL talk: giving patients opportunities to choose whether to engage in conversations about EoL whilst being sensitive to their communication needs, preferences and state of readiness for such dialogue.
机译:目的: ud了解姑息医学医生如何使患者参与临终关怀(EoL)讨论。要检查在EoL护理文献中广泛提倡的“引发和响应提示”的做法是否促进了EoL谈话。 ud udDesign: ud对视频和音频录制咨询的对话分析。 ud ud : ud未经选择的绝症患者及其同伴,请与经验丰富的姑息治疗医生进行协商。 ud ud设置: ud门诊诊所,日间治疗诊所和单个英国临终关怀医院的住院单元。 ud ud结果: ud医生最常提倡EoL通过公开的详细讨论进行交谈;这些为患者创造了机会介绍Ð,然后在以后进一步阐明ÐEoL考虑因素,以使医生不会公开询问EoL事宜。重要的是,避免精心设计的措辞避免了假设患者有EoL问题。如果患者在不提出EoL要求的情况下对开放式详细招标做出了回应,则医生有时会通过转为参与性较低和推定性较高的招标方式进行EoL对话,这表明患者可能存在EoL问题。这些更公开的邀请仅在以后的会诊中使用,这表明医生优先考虑自愿进行EoL讨论的患者,并为他们提供了机会率先发起EoL谈话。 ud有证据表明,医生将对患者谈话的阐述视为使他们参与EoL对话的资源。但是,将谈话标记为“线索”存在一些限制,这在EoL通信上下文中很常见。我们检查了这些局限性,并提出了“可能的EoL注意事项”作为描述上更准确的术语。 ud ud结论: ud通过公开阐述请求传达Ð,从而为患者创造了自愿EoL考虑因素的机会,医生在此过程中克服了核心难题促进EoL对话:让患者有机会选择是否参与有关EoL的对话,同时要注意他们的交流需求,偏好和这种对话的准备状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号