首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of a two-sided windcatcher integrated with wing wall (as a new design) and comparison with a conventional windcatcher
【2h】

Evaluation of a two-sided windcatcher integrated with wing wall (as a new design) and comparison with a conventional windcatcher

机译:评估与翼墙集成的双侧风车(作为新设计)并与传统风车进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In buildings, 60% of the energy consumption is associated to Heating, Ventilation and Air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. One solution to reduce this share is the application of natural ventilation systems. Windcatcher and wing wall are two well-known techniques for natural ventilation which have been used in different regions. Nevertheless, in areas with low wind speed such as the tropical climate of Malaysia there is hesitation for application of natural ventilation systems. The integration of windcatcher with wing wall can potentially enhance the ventilation performance. However, this configuration was not looked into by pervious investigations thus, this study aims to address this research gap by first evaluating the effect of wing wall with various angles on the ventilation performance and second compare the performance of this new design with a conventional windcatcher. This research used two main investigative steps: experimental scaled wind tunnel testing and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. Four reduced-scale models of two-sided windcatcher were tested in a low speed wind tunnel. Three models were integrated with wing wall in 30°, 45° and 60° incident angles and another windcatcher was a conventional two-sided windcatcher, which is typical in regions with predominant wind direction. The CFD validation against experiment showed good agreement. The best operation was observed in the windcatcher with 30° wing wall angle which could supply 910 l/s fresh air into the room in 2.5 m/s wind speed. Hence, the new design had 50% more ventilation performance comparing with conventional two-sided windcatcher in the same external wind speed. Finally, it was concluded that the new design satisfied requirements of ASHRAE 62.1.
机译:在建筑物中,能源消耗的60%与供暖,通风和空调(HVAC)系统有关。减少这一份额的一种解决方案是自然通风系统的应用。捕风器和机翼墙是两种众所周知的自然通风技术,已在不同地区使用。然而,在低风速的地区,例如马来西亚的热带气候,对于使用自然通风系统还是有些犹豫。捕风器与机翼壁的集成可以潜在地提高通风性能。但是,这种结构并未经过以往的调查研究,因此,本研究旨在通过首先评估各种角度的机翼壁对通风性能的影响,然后将该新设计的性能与常规捕风器进行比较来解决这一研究空白。这项研究使用了两个主要的研究步骤:实验规模的风洞测试和计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟。在低速风洞中测试了四个缩小模型的双面捕风器。三种模型与入射角为30°,45°和60°的机翼壁集成在一起,另一个挡风板是传统的双面挡风板,这在风向为主的地区是典型的。针对实验的CFD验证显示出良好的一致性。在具有30°机翼壁角的风捕器中观察到最佳操作,这可以在2.5 m / s的风速下向室内提供910 l / s的新鲜空气。因此,在相同的外部风速下,新设计的通风性能比传统的双面捕风器高出50%。最后,得出的结论是,新设计满足了ASHRAE 62.1的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号