Objective The present study aimed to determine whether a multi-component school-based intervention can maintain children's fruit and vegetable intake post eligibility for free school fruit and vegetables. Design A random sample of fifty-four English primary schools was randomised to receive the 10-month intervention Project Tomato, a multi-component theory-based intervention, or the control. Each group consisted of twenty-seven schools. Setting Children's intake of fruit and vegetables is below recommendations. The English School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme has a short-term impact on intake while children are eligible for the scheme. Subjects Dietary measurements were collected from 658 Year 2 pupils aged 7–8 years at baseline and at follow-up 20 months later. Results Following an intention to treat analysis, the intervention as delivered compared with the control had no impact on the intake of fruit and vegetables (2 g/d, 95 % CI −23, 26 g/d) or on the number of portions of fruit (0·0 portions, 95 % CI −0·3, 0·3) or vegetables (0·0 portions, 95 % CI −0·2, 0·3) consumed daily by children. Intake of fruit and vegetables at school and home dropped by ∼100 g/d and 50 g/d, respectively, between baseline and follow-up in both the intervention and control groups. Conclusions Implementation of the intervention was low, with associated lack of impact on fruit and vegetable consumption in children. Alternatives to the delivery of an intervention by teachers and parents are needed to improve the dietary intake of primary-school children.
展开▼
机译:目的本研究旨在确定一项基于学校的多方面干预措施能否在获得免费学校水果和蔬菜的资格后维持儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量。设计对54所英语小学的随机样本进行了随机抽样,以接受为期10个月的干预计划番茄项目,这是一种基于多成分理论的干预措施或对照。每个小组包括27所学校。设置低于儿童摄入水果和蔬菜的建议。英语学校的水果和蔬菜计划对摄入量有短期影响,而儿童有资格参加该计划。受试者在基线和20个月后的随访中,从658位7-8岁的2年级2年级学生中收集了饮食数据。结果经过治疗分析后,与对照组相比,干预措施对水果和蔬菜的摄入量(2 g / d,95%CI -23,26 g / d)或水果的摄入量没有影响。儿童每天食用的水果(0.0份,95%CI -0.3,0.3)或蔬菜(0.0份,95%CI -0.2,0.3)。在干预组和对照组中,在基线和随访之间,学校和家庭中水果和蔬菜的摄入量分别下降了约100 g / d和50 g / d。结论干预措施实施率低,对儿童水果和蔬菜的消费缺乏相关影响。需要教师和父母采取干预措施的替代方案,以改善小学生的饮食摄入。
展开▼