首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Evaluation of Image Reconstruction Methods for the Siemens PET-MR Scanner Using the STIR Library
【2h】

Comparative Evaluation of Image Reconstruction Methods for the Siemens PET-MR Scanner Using the STIR Library

机译:西门子pET-mR扫描仪图像重建方法的sTIR库比较评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the introduction of Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) scanners the development of new algorithms and the comparison of the performance of different iterative reconstruction algorithms and the characteristics of the reconstructed images data is relevant. In this work, we perform a quantitative assessment of the currently used ordered subset (OS) algorithms for low-counts PET-MR data taken from a Siemens Biograph mMR scanner using the Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction (STIR, stir.sf.net). A comparison has been performed in terms of bias and coefficient of variation (CoV). Within the STIR library different algorithms are available, such as Order Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM), OS Maximum A Posteriori One Step Late (OSMAPOSL) with Quadratic Prior (QP) and with Median Root Prior (MRP), OS Separable Paraboloidal Surrogate (OSSPS) with QP and Filtered Back-Projection (FBP). In addition, List Mode (LM) reconstruction is available. Corrections for attenuation, scatter and random events are performed using STIR instead of using the scanner. Data from the Hoffman brain phantom are acquired, processed and reconstructed. Clinical data from the thorax of a patient have also been reconstructed with the same algorithms. The number of subsets does not appreciably affect the bias nor the coefficient of variation (CoV=11%) at a fixed sub iteration number. The percentage relative bias and CoV maximum values for OSMAPOSL-MRP are 10% and 15% at 360 s acquisition and 12% and 15% for the 36 s, whilst for OSMAPOSL-QP they are 6% and 16% for 360 s acquisition and 11% and 23% at 36 s and for OSEM 6% and 11% for the 360 s acquisition and 10% and 15% for the 36 s. Our findings demonstrate that when it comes to low-counts, noise and bias become significant. The methodology for reconstructing Siemens mMR data with STIR is included in the CCP-PET-MR website (www.ccppetmr.ac.uk).
机译:随着正电子发射断层成像-磁共振(PET-MR)扫描仪的推出,新算法的发展以及不同迭代重建算法的性能比较与重建图像数据的特性相关。在这项工作中,我们对当前使用的有序子集(OS)算法进行定量评估,以使用CT图像重建软件(STIR,stir.sf.net)从Siemens Biograph mMR扫描仪获取的低计数PET-MR数据。 。已根据偏差和变异系数(CoV)进行了比较。在STIR库中,可以使用不同的算法,例如订单子集期望最大化(OSEM),具有二次优先级(QP)和中值根优先级(MRP)的OS最大后验一步滞后(OSMAPOSL),OS可分离抛物面替代(OSSPS) )和QP和过滤后向投影(FBP)。此外,还可以使用列表模式(LM)重建。使用STIR而非扫描仪对衰减,散射和随机事件进行校正。来自霍夫曼脑部幻影的数据被采集,处理和重建。来自患者胸腔的临床数据也已经使用相同的算法进行了重建。在固定的子迭代次数下,子集的数量不会显着影响偏差或变异系数(CoV = 11%)。 OSMAPOSL-MRP的百分比相对偏差和CoV最大值在360 s采集时分别为10%和15%,在36 s时为12%和15%,而OSMAPOSL-QP在360 s采集时分别为6%和16%。在36 s时分别为11%和23%,在OSEM中360 s为6%和11%,在36 s为10%和15%。我们的发现表明,当涉及到低计数时,噪声和偏差会变得很明显。 CCP-PET-MR网站(www.ccppetmr.ac.uk)中包含使用STIR重建Siemens mMR数据的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号