首页> 外文OA文献 >An investigation of the sensory and motor innervation of extraocular muscles in monkey and rat with combined tract-tracing and immunofluorescence methods: evidence for a dual motor innervation as common concept in mammals
【2h】

An investigation of the sensory and motor innervation of extraocular muscles in monkey and rat with combined tract-tracing and immunofluorescence methods: evidence for a dual motor innervation as common concept in mammals

机译:用组合示踪和免疫荧光方法研究猴和大鼠眼外肌的感觉和运动神经支配:双运动神经支配作为哺乳动物常见概念的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The oculomotor system is one of the best studied motor systems. Afferents from a variety of premotor areas converge on the motoneurons in the three oculomotor nuclei to produce the different types of eye movements. All oculomotor motoneurons participate in all types of eye movements, and it was generally accepted, that these motoneurons form a relative homogenous group which provides the final common pathway for extraocular muscle (EOM)-motor innervation. The EOM in mammals, the effector organs of the oculomotor system, are fundamentally different from skeletal muscle. They have two functionally different layers, global and orbital layer, and are composed of two major muscle fibre classes, singly-innervated (SIF) and multiply innervated fibres (MIF). Previous studies in monkey revealed that SIF and MIF motoneurons are anatomically separated and have different premotor inputs, which support the idea of a dual motor innervation of EOM rather than a final common pathway from motoneuron to EOM. Up to date, neither motoneuron type has been further characterized nor has any study proven their presence in other species to support the hypothesis of the dual motor innervation as a common concept in mammals. The functional implication of this system remains speculative, though a role of MIFs together with their motoneurons in a sensory feedback system controlling the EOMs is quite possible and heavily debated. However, the lack of a common proprioceptor in eye muscles does not support this theory.In monkeys SIF and MIF motoneurons of extraocular muscles were identified by tracer injections into the belly or the distal myotendinous junction of the medial or lateral rectus muscle and further characterized by combined tracer detection and immunohistochemical methods. The experiments revealed that the MIF motoneurons in the periphery of the motor nuclei lack non-phosphorylated neurofilaments, parvalbumin and perineuronal nets, whereas SIF motoneurons intensively express all three markers. In addition to the histochemical differences, the MIF motoneurons are on average significantly smaller in size than the SIF motoneurons.Analogous to the study in monkey, the SIF and MIF motoneurons of the medial and lateral rectus muscle of rats were identified with tracer injections and further characterized by immunolabelling. For the first time it was shown that both motoneurons types are present in rat as well. The MIF motoneurons lie mainly separated from the SIF motoneurons, and are different in size and histochemical properties. As in monkey, the smaller MIF motoneurons lack non-phosphorylated neurofilaments and perineuronal nets, both of which are definite markers for the larger SIF motoneurons.A possible proprioceptive control of eye movements requires the presence of proprioceptive structures. The palisade endings represent the best candidate for an EOM-proprioceptor. They were analysed using antibody stains against the synaptosomal associated protein of 25kDA, SNAP-25. With this robust method palisade ending-like structures were identified for the first time in the extraocular muscles of the rat. Furthermore the rat palisade endings show characteristics of sensory structures thereby supporting their role in proprioception. In conclusion, the EOM of both monkey and rat are innervated by two sets of motoneurons which differ in localization, morphology and molecular components. These findings further support the presence of a dual motor control of EOM that may apply widely to mammals, since it was verified in monkey and rat. Palisade endings are a ubiquitous feature of mammal EOM and most likely provide sensory information used for the proprioceptive control of eye movements.
机译:动眼系统是研究最深入的运动系统之一。来自各种运动前区域的传入分子会聚在三个动眼神经核的运动神经元上,以产生不同类型的眼球运动。所有动眼神经元都参与所有类型的眼球运动,并且人们普遍认为,这些动神经元形成相对同质的基团,为眼外肌(EOM)-运动神经支配提供最终的通用途径。哺乳动物的动眼素是动眼系统的效应器官,与骨骼肌根本不同。它们具有两个功能不同的层,即全局层和轨道层,并且由两个主要的肌肉纤维类别组成,即单神经支配(SIF)和多神经支配纤维(MIF)。先前在猴子中的研究表明,SIF和MIF运动神经元在解剖学上是分开的,并且具有不同的运动前输入,这支持EOM的双重运动神经支配,而不是从运动神经元到EOM的最终共同途径。迄今为止,尚未对运动神经元类型进行进一步表征,也没有任何研究证明它们存在于其他物种中,以支持双运动神经支配作为哺乳动物普遍观念的假设。尽管MIF及其运动神经元在控制EOM的感觉反馈系统中的作用是完全可能的,并且争论不休,但该系统的功能含义仍是推测性的。然而,眼部肌肉缺乏通用的本体感受器并不支持该理论。在猴子中,通过示踪剂向腹部或内侧或外侧直肌的肌腱末端交界的示踪剂识别出眼外肌的SIF和MIF运动神经元,其进一步特征在于结合了示踪剂检测和免疫组织化学方法。实验表明,运动核外围的MIF运动神经元缺乏非磷酸化的神经丝,小白蛋白和神经周围神经网,而SIF运动神经元则强烈表达所有这三种标记。除了组织化学差异外,MIF运动神经元的大小平均比SIF运动神经元小得多。类似于猴子的研究,通过示踪剂注射鉴定了大鼠内侧和外侧直肌的SIF和MIF运动神经元。以免疫标记为特征。首次表明大鼠中也存在两种运动神经元。 MIF运动神经元主要与SIF运动神经元分开,并且在大小和组织化学性质上都不同。像猴子一样,较小的MIF运动神经元缺乏非磷酸化的神经丝和神经周神经网,这两者都是较大的SIF运动神经元的明确标志物。可能对眼睛运动的本体感受控制需要存在本体感受结构。栅栏末端代表EOM本体感受器的最佳候选者。使用针对25kDA的突触体相关蛋白SNAP-25的抗体染色剂对它们进行了分析。用这种鲁棒的方法,首次在大鼠眼外肌中识别出栅栏末端样结构。此外,大鼠木栅末端显示出感觉结构的特征,从而支持其在本体感受中的作用。总之,猴子和大鼠的EOM受两组定位,形态和分子组成不同的运动神经元的神经支配。这些发现进一步支持了EOM双重运动控制的存在,因为它已在猴子和大鼠中得到验证,因此可广泛应用于哺乳动物。栅栏末端是哺乳动物EOM普遍存在的特征,最有可能提供用于眼球运动的本体感受控制的感觉信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eberhorn Andreas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号