首页> 外文OA文献 >Selection of fusion levels using the fulcrum bending radiograph for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with alternate level pedicle screw strategy: clinical decision-making and outcomes
【2h】

Selection of fusion levels using the fulcrum bending radiograph for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with alternate level pedicle screw strategy: clinical decision-making and outcomes

机译:使用支点弯曲X线片选择融合水平用于管理青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的替代水平椎弓根螺钉策略:临床决策和结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective Selecting fusion levels based on the Luk et al criteria for operative management of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with hook and hybrid systems yields acceptable curve correction and balance parameters; however, it is unknown whether utilizing a purely pedicle screw strategy is effective. Utilizing the fulcrum bending radiographic (FBR) to assess curve flexibility to select fusion levels, the following study assessed the efficacy of pedicle screw fixation with alternate level screw strategy (ALSS) for thoracic AIS. Methods A retrospective study with prospective radiographic data collection/analyses (preoperative, postoperative 1-week and minimum 2-year follow-up) of 28 operative thoracic AIS patients undergoing ALSS was performed. Standing coronal/sagittal and FBR Cobb angles, FBR flexibility, fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI), trunkal shift, radiographic shoulder height (RSH), and list were assessed on x-rays. Fusion level selection was based on the Luk et al criteria and compared to conventional techniques. Results In the primary curve, the mean preoperative and postoperative 1 week and last follow-up standing coronal Cobb angles were 59.9, 17.2 and 20.0 degrees, respectively. Eighteen patients (64.3%) had distal levels saved (mean: 1.6 levels) in comparison to conventional techniques. Mean immediate and last follow-up FBCIs were 122.6% and 115.0%, respectively. Sagittal alignment did not statistically differ between any assessment intervals (p>0.05). A decrease in trunkal shift was noted from preoperative to last follow-up (p = 0.003). No statistically significant difference from preoperative to last follow-up was noted in RSH and list (p>0.05). No "add-on" of other vertebra or decompensation was noted and all patients achieved fusion. Conclusions This is the first report to note that using the FBR for decision-making in selecting fusion levels in thoracic AIS patients undergoing management with pedicle screw constructs (e.g. ALSS) is a cost-effective strategy that can achieve clinically-relevant deformity correction that is maintained and without compromising fusion levels.
机译:目的根据Luk等人的标准选择具有钩和混合系统的胸,青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的手术管理融合水平,可获得可接受的曲线校正和平衡参数;然而,利用单纯椎弓根螺钉策略是否有效尚不明确。利用支点弯曲射线照相(FBR)评估曲线的灵活性来选择融合水平,以下研究评估了采用椎弓根螺钉固定和替代水平螺钉策略(ALSS)进行胸椎AIS的疗效。方法对28例行ALSS的手术胸AIS患者进行回顾性研究,包括前瞻性影像学数据收集/分析(术前,术后1周和最少2年随访)。站立的冠状/矢状位和FBR Cobb角,FBR柔韧性,支点弯曲校正指数(FBCI),躯干移位,放射照相的肩高(RSH)和清单均在X光片上进行了评估。融合水平的选择基于Luk等人的标准,并与常规技术进行了比较。结果在初级曲线中,术前和术后1周的平均站立位和末次随访时冠状Cobb角分别为59.9度,17.2度和20.0度。与传统技术相比,有18例患者(64.3%)节省了远端水平(平均:1.6个水平)。平均立即和最后随访FBCI分别为122.6%和115.0%。在任何评估间隔之间,矢状位对准均无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。从术前到最后一次随访发现躯干移位减少(p = 0.003)。从术前到最后一次随访,RSH和清单中均无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。没有注意到其他椎骨的“附加”或代偿失调,所有患者均达到融合。结论这是第一份报告指出,使用FBR进行选择椎弓根螺钉构造(例如ALSS)治疗的胸AIS患者的融合水平选择是一种具有成本效益的策略,可以实现与临床相关的畸形矫正保持并且不影响融合水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号