首页> 外文OA文献 >Knowledge transfer via cooperative research - How Universities and Universities of Applied Science are positioned in the German research network
【2h】

Knowledge transfer via cooperative research - How Universities and Universities of Applied Science are positioned in the German research network

机译:通过合作研究进行知识转移 - 应用科学大学和大学如何定位于德国研究网络

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Main tasks of academia are to create new knowledge and to transfer that knowledge into the economy. Regarding this work, four channels of knowledge transfer are considered (based on Hamm et al, 2012): (1) basic transfer e.g. publications, (2) human capital e.g. graduates, (3) formation of enterprises, in this case spin offs and (4) via research, e.g. especially cooperative research. The question to be answered is: How do the different channels through which the knowledge is meant to flow into the economy vary regarding different types of academia? Regarding the German higher education system especially two types of academia can be differentiated. These are the universities on the one hand and the universities of applied science on the other hand. These different types of higher education institutions (HEI) in Germany show distinctive characteristics, e.g. more application oriented versus research oriented teaching, personnel structure (more research assistance in universities) etc. Regarding the transfer of knowledge two questions (which are interwoven) arise: (1) Does the intensity of transfer vary between the different HEI types? (2) Is the spatial distribution of knowledge different, regarding the two diverging types of HEIs? While in this work only a few things will be said about the channels one to three, the focus is on the fourth channel: knowledge transfer via research. Using data from the ?Fud6KAT? (the ?Fuf6rderkatalog? of the German Ministry of Education and Research) a research network between companies, institutions and academia is unveiled. This online catalog contains about 110000 data set entries of direct project funding of the German government. The analyzed data in this work is restricted to all currently ongoing projects. The resulting set of data contains 22722 data set entries which include information on cooperative and non-cooperative projects. 5966 cooperative projects are counted. These are the ones used to unveil the network which in the end includes institutional research facilities, companies and academia. Using centrality measures such as degree, closeness and betweenness the position of the different HEI types within the network can be measured and compared. Degree-centrality can be used to observe cooperative activity, as it measures the number of direct linkages. Closeness-centrality uses the information on the average path length to every other actor within the network. This way a high closeness-centrality can be used as an indicator for inheriting a position with good access to new knowledge and/or a position which can be used to give impulses to the network that reach all other actors fast. Lastly the betweenness-centrality can be used as an indicator for control options within the network, in terms of knowledge brokerage. It can be observed that the centrality measures are significantly higher for universities than for universities of applied science.
机译:学术界的主要任务是创造新知识并将该知识转移到经济中。关于这项工作,考虑了知识转移的四个渠道(基于Hamm等人,2012年):(1)基本转移,例如知识转移。 (2)人力资本,例如(3)成立企业,在这种情况下是分拆出来的;(4)通过研究,例如特别是合作研究。需要回答的问题是:学术界不同类型的知识流经经济的不同渠道如何变化?关于德国的高等教育体系,尤其可以区分两种学术界。一方面是大学,另一方面是应用科学大学。德国的这些不同类型的高等教育机构(HEI)具有鲜明的特征,例如与面向应用的教学相比,面向研究的教学,人员结构(大学中更多的研究支持)等更多信息。关于知识的转移,出现了两个问题(交织在一起):(1)不同类型的HEI的转移强度是否有所不同? (2)关于两种不同类型的高等教育机构,知识的空间分布是否不同?尽管在这项工作中,关于一到三个渠道只说了几句话,但重点是第四个渠道:通过研究进行知识转移。使用来自?F ud6KAT的数据? (德国教育和研究部的“ F uf6rderkatalog”)公开了公司,机构和学术界之间的研究网络。该在线目录包含德国政府直接项目资助的大约110000个数据集条目。这项工作中的分析数据仅限于所有当前正在进行的项目。结果数据集包含22722个数据集条目,其中包含有关合作和非合作项目的信息。统计合作项目5966个。这些是用来揭开网络的网络,该网络最终包括机构研究机构,公司和学术界。使用诸如程度,紧密度和中间度之类的中心性度量,可以测量和比较网络中不同HEI类型的位置。程度中心性可以用来观察合作活动,因为它可以衡量直接联系的数量。靠近中心性使用有关到网络内其他所有参与者的平均路径长度的信息。这样,高度亲密性-中心性可以被用作用于继承对新知识有良好访问权的位置的指示符和/或可以被用来给网络快速冲动并快速到达所有其他参与者的位置的指示符。最后,就知识中介而言,中介中心可以用作网络内控制选项的指标。可以看出,大学的集中度措施明显高于应用科学大学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Strotebeck Falk;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号