首页> 外文OA文献 >Non-financial value-added of venture capital: A comparative study of different venture capital investors
【2h】

Non-financial value-added of venture capital: A comparative study of different venture capital investors

机译:风险投资的非财务增值:对不同风险投资者的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study focuses on the non-financial value-added Venture Capital (VC) investors bring to their portfolio companies, especially when these represent early-stage, high-technology and high-growth companies. The study draws attention to the extent and nature of non-financial value-added and analyses whether and in what ways different types of VC investors differ in this respect. The data were collected via a web-based survey tool in the autumn of 2006. The study takes into consideration the viewpoint of VC investors as it focuses on Finnish VC companies (private sector VCs), public sector VC organisations and informal investors (business angels). An effort was made to collect data from foreign investors active in Finland though they did not respond actively. Major findings of the study included the observation that private sector VCs were the most and public sector VCs the least active in monitoring their portfolio companies. Informal VCs were less active than expected. The different investor types had distinct profiles in providing management support and advice. Overall, private sector VCs evaluated the non-financial support they provided as the most and public sector VCs the least important for the success of their portfolio companies while informal VCs were between these extremes. These findings differed from those obtained in our study on the value-adding function of VCs in biotechnology, according to which informal VCs were found to have the highest overall value-added and kept closest contacts with their investee firms.
机译:这项研究的重点是将非金融增值的风险投资(VC)投资者带入他们的投资组合公司,尤其是当这些代表早期,高科技和高成长性公司时。该研究引起人们对非金融增值的程度和性质的关注,并分析了不同类型的风险投资人在这方面是否以及以何种方式有所不同。数据是在2006年秋季通过基于网络的调查工具收集的。该研究考虑了VC投资者的观点,因为它关注的是芬兰VC公司(私营部门VC),公共部门VC组织和非正式投资者(商业天使) )。尽管他们没有积极回应,但仍努力从活跃在芬兰的外国投资者那里收集数据。该研究的主要发现包括观察到,私营部门的风险投资人最活跃,而公共部门的风险投资人最不活跃。非正式VC的活跃度低于预期。不同的投资者类型在提供管理支持和建议方面有不同的概况。总体而言,私营部门的风险投资机构对其提供的非金融支持进行了评估,它们对投资组合公司的成功起着最重要的作用,而公共部门的风险投资对他们的投资组合公司的成功起着最不重要的作用,而非正式风险投资机构则处于这两种极端之间。这些发现与我们在生物技术领域中的风险投资的增值功能研究中获得的结果不同,在该研究中,非正式风险投资被发现具有最高的总体增值并与被投资公司保持密切联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号