首页> 外文OA文献 >Firms' strategies for knowledge and technology transfer with public research organisations and their impact on firms' performance: An empirical analysis based on firm-level data
【2h】

Firms' strategies for knowledge and technology transfer with public research organisations and their impact on firms' performance: An empirical analysis based on firm-level data

机译:企业与公共研究机构进行知识和技术转让的战略及其对企业绩效的影响:基于企业层面数据的实证分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on a representative firm sample for Switzerland we empirically investigated strategic approaches for knowledge and technology transfer (KTT) activities between business firms and public research organisations. Based on cluster analysis of 19 different forms for KTT, three types of KTT strategies were identified, each of them correspond with a specific combination of some of the 19 different forms for KTT activities. It was found that they are determined mainly by variables related (a) to the absorptive capacity of a firm and (b) to the degree of appropriability of the returns of innovation, indicating that the followed strategy reflects the resource base of a firm. Further, it was shown that a firm's obstacle profile with respect to KTT activities is related to the applied strategy. Firms with more intensive contacts emphasise risk-related factors and financial restrictions, while firms with less intensive contacts emphasise a mismatch between firm and university requirements with respect to KTT. Furthermore and most importantly, it was found that strategy matters for the impact of KTT on the innovation performance of a firm. In fact, KTT strategies related to the core R&D activities of a firm showed a greater impact compared to strategies related to softer forms of transfer activities, e.g. informal contacts or education related contacts.
机译:基于瑞士的代表性公司样本,我们对商业公司与公共研究组织之间的知识和技术转让(KTT)活动的战略方法进行了实证研究。在对19种不同形式的KTT进行聚类分析的基础上,确定了三种类型的KTT策略,每种策略对应于19种不同形式的KTT活动的特定组合。发现它们主要由与(a)与企业的吸收能力和(b)与创新回报的可利用程度有关的变量决定,这表明所遵循的策略反映了企业的资源基础。此外,还表明,企业在KTT活动方面的障碍与应用策略有关。紧密联系的公司强调与风险相关的因素和财务限制,而紧密联系的公司则强调公司和大学对KTT的要求不匹配。此外,最重要的是,发现战略对于KTT对公司创新绩效的影响至关重要。实际上,与公司核心R&D活动相关的KTT策略与与软化形式的转让活动​​相关的策略相比,其影响更大。非正式联系或与教育相关的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号