首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Insiders Contribute to Market Efficiency? Informational Efficiency and Liquidity of Experimental Call Markets with and without Insiders
【2h】

Do Insiders Contribute to Market Efficiency? Informational Efficiency and Liquidity of Experimental Call Markets with and without Insiders

机译:内部人有助于市场效率吗?有和没有内部人员的实验性呼叫市场的信息效率和流动性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper reports the results of 13 experimental asset markets with 195 subjects that explore the effects of insider behavior on the price formation process and market liquidity. The experimental call markets use a more realistic design than related studies. We introduce infinitely-lived assets instead of periodical liquidation (so-called ?reset? markets) and provide full market transparency to the investors with an open orderbook. Our main findings are that insider trading does not improve informational efficiency at all but depresses market liquidity of the assets significantly. At a first glance, the observed spread widening as an impact of insider behavior leads to the conclusion that our call markets react ?as if? all subjects behave rationally like dealers in a market making environment. At a second glance, a first look into the individual data shows that only a smaller group of investors act as ?endogenous? market makers in the call market regime.
机译:本文报告了195个主题的13个实验性资产市场的结果,探讨了内部人行为对价格形成过程和市场流动性的影响。与相关研究相比,实验性看涨市场使用了更现实的设计。我们引入无限期资产而不是定期清算(所谓的“重置”市场),并通过开放的订单簿为投资者提供完全的市场透明度。我们的主要发现是,内幕交易根本不会提高信息效率,但是会大大降低资产的市场流动性。乍一看,由于内部人行为的影响,观察到的价差扩大,得出结论,我们的看涨市场反应“好像”吗?在做市环境中,所有主题的行为都像经销商一样理性。乍一看,对单个数据的第一眼观察表明,只有一小部分投资者是“内生”投资者。呼叫市场制度中的做市商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号