首页> 外文OA文献 >Subjective and biodynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to whole-body vertical vibration at low frequency
【2h】

Subjective and biodynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to whole-body vertical vibration at low frequency

机译:坐着的受试者在低频下暴露于全身垂直振动的主观和生物动力学反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the magnitude of vertical whole-body vibration increases, the resonance frequency in the apparent mass of the human body reduces and there are changes in the frequency-dependence of acceleration equivalent comfort contours. It is unclear to what extent these two ‘nonlinearities’ are related. This thesis seeks to advance understanding of the combined influence of the magnitude and the frequency of whole-body vertical vibration on the subjective and biodynamic responses of the seated human. Specifically, the research was designed to identify whether the nonlinearity in the subjective responses reflects the nonlinearity in the biodynamic responses, and whether comfort would be better predicted from the force applied to the body.The first experiment was designed to investigate how the biodynamic and subjective responses of seated subjects (20 males and 20 females) depend on the frequency, magnitude, and waveform of vertical vibration when they were exposed to sinusoidal and random vibration. The vertical apparent mass and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass obtained with random and sinusoidal vibration were both nonlinear but similar at the same overall magnitude (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 ms-2 r.m.s.). With both increasing acceleration and increasing force, the rate of growth of discomfort depended on the frequency of vibration. Both acceleration and force equivalent comfort contours (the magnitude of vibration expressed as a function of frequency which produces similar degrees of discomfort) varied with the magnitude of vibration. The equivalent comfort contours were less dependent on the magnitude of vibration when expressed by force than by acceleration. There were statistically significant positive correlations between the biodynamic responses and subjective responses at all frequencies in the range 1 to 16 Hz.The second experiment investigated subjective and biodynamic responses to a series of upward and downward vertical mechanical shocks at 13 fundamental frequencies (1 to 16 Hz) and 18 magnitudes (unweighted peak accelerations in the range 0.12 to 8.0 ms-2). The optimum stiffness and optimum damping of two lumped parameter models fitted to the measured acceleration time history decreased as the shock magnitudes increased. With both models, and with both downward and upward shocks, the median principal resonance frequency of the apparent mass of the body decreased from 6.3 to 4 Hz as the magnitude of the shocks increased from 0.05 ms-1.75 to 2.0 ms-1.75 VDV. There was no consistent difference in the rate of growth of discomfort between acceleration and force, or between upward and downward shocks, or between lower magnitude and higher magnitude shocks.The final experiment compared subjective responses of the human body with a rigid seat and a soft seat. With increasing magnitude of vibration (both acceleration and force), the rate of growth of discomfort was dependent on the frequency of vibration, but did not differ between the rigid seat and the soft seat. There were no significant differences in either the force or acceleration equivalent comfort contours on the rigid seat compared with those on the soft seat. The frequency-dependence of the force equivalent comfort contours showed less nonlinearity than the acceleration equivalent comfort contours with both the rigid and soft seat conditions.In conclusion, this study indicates some similarities in the nonlinearity of subjective responses and biodynamic responses of the seated body exposed to vertical vibration. Although force equivalent comfort contours are also nonlinear, they showed less dependence on the magnitude of the excitation than acceleration equivalent comfort contours.
机译:随着垂直全身振动的幅度增加,人体的表观质量中的共振频率降低,并且加速度等效舒适度轮廓的频率依赖性发生变化。目前尚不清楚这两个“非线性”之间的关联程度。本论文旨在增进对全身垂直振动幅度和频率对就座人的主观和生物动力反应的综合影响的理解。具体来说,该研究旨在确定主观反应的非线性是否反映了生物力学反应的非线性,以及是否可以通过施加到人体的力更好地预测舒适度。第一个实验旨在研究生物力学和主观反应如何坐着的受试者(20位男性和20位女性)的反应取决于正弦和随机振动时垂直振动的频率,幅度和波形。通过随机振动和正弦振动获得的垂直视在质量和前后横轴视在质量都是非线性的,但在相同的总大小(0.1、0.2、0.4、0.8和1.6 ms-2 r.m.s.)下相似。随着加速度和力的增加,不适感的增长速度取决于振动的频率。加速度和力的等效舒适度等值线(振动的大小表示为产生类似不适程度的频率的函数)随振动的大小而变化。当用力表示时,等效的舒适度轮廓对振动的依赖性较小,而对加速度的依赖性较小。在1至16 Hz的所有频率下,生物动力响应与主观响应之间存在统计学上显着的正相关性。第二个实验研究了在13个基本频率(1至16 Hz)下一系列向上和向下垂直机械冲击的主观和生物动力响应Hz)和18个大小(未加权峰值加速度在0.12到8.0 ms-2之间)。随测得的加速时间变化而变化的两个集总参数模型的最佳刚度和最佳阻尼随着冲击强度的增加而降低。对于两种模型,以及向下和向上冲击,随着冲击幅度从0.05 ms-1.75增至2.0 ms-1.75 VDV,人体表观质量的中值主共振频率从6.3 Hz降低至4 Hz。加速度和力之间,向上和向下的冲击之间,或较低和较高的冲击之间的不适感的增长率没有一致的差异。最终实验比较了人体的主观反应与刚性坐垫和柔软坐垫座位。随着振动幅度(加速度和力)的增加,不适感的增长速度取决于振动频率,但刚性座椅和软座椅之间没有差异。与软座椅相比,硬质座椅上的力或加速度等效舒适度轮廓没有显着差异。在刚性和软性座椅条件下,等效力舒适轮廓的频率相关性都比加速度等效舒适性轮廓的非线性小。总之,本研究表明暴露的座椅主体的主观反应和生物动力反应的非线性存在一些相似之处垂直振动。尽管等效力的舒适度等值线也是非线性的,但与加速度等效的等值线相比,它们对激励幅度的依赖性较小。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhou Zhen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号