首页> 外文OA文献 >Is it better to use gate opening as control variable than discharge to control irrigation canals?
【2h】

Is it better to use gate opening as control variable than discharge to control irrigation canals?

机译:使用闸门开度作为控制变量比排放控制灌溉渠道更好吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Centralized model predictive controllers are common in water systems. The control action variable can be the discharge, and the subsystems (canal pools) are modeled separately. This paper focuses on short canal pools where the interactions are stronger between canal pools. Could this procedure be better if gate openings were used as control action variables and the interconnected system were modeled for the controller? Model predictive controllers (MPCs) were developed using the discharge and the gate opening as control action variable and tested experimentally using the laboratory canal of the Technical University of Catalonia. It was found that for centralized MPCs for short canal pools, the use of gate opening as control action variable is more beneficial than discharge. Another additional advantage is that in this way it is possible to put constraints on the gate opening and the change of gate opening, which are important to the limitations of the physical system. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:集中模型预测控制器在供水系统中很常见。控制作用变量可以是流量,并且子系统(渠道池)是单独建模的。本文着眼于短运河池,其中运河池之间的相互作用更强。如果将闸门开口用作控制动作变量并且为控制器建模了互连系统,此程序会更好吗?使用排放和闸门开度作为控制动作变量开发了模型预测控制器(MPC),并使用加泰罗尼亚技术大学的实验室运河进行了实验测试。已发现,对于短运河池的集中式MPC,使用闸门打开作为控制作用变量要比排放更为有利。另一个额外的优点是,通过这种方式,可以对门的开度和门的开度变化施加限制,这对于物理系统的限制很重要。 (C)2014年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号