首页> 外文OA文献 >Compliance effects in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for chronic low back pain: a methodological study.
【2h】

Compliance effects in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for chronic low back pain: a methodological study.

机译:瑜伽慢性腰痛的随机对照试验中的顺应性效应:方法学研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Methodological study nested within a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of yoga plus usual general practitioner (GP) care vs usual GP care for chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To explore the treatment effects of non-compliance using three approaches in an RCT evaluating yoga for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A large multicentre RCT using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis found that participants with chronic low back pain who were offered a 12-week progressive programme of yoga plus usual GP care had better back function than those offered usual GP care alone. However, ITT analysis can underestimate the effect of treatment in those who comply with treatment. As such, the data were analysed using other approaches to assess the problem of non-compliance. The main outcome measure was the self-reported Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). METHODS: Complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis, per-protocol analysis and on-treatment analysis were conducted on the data of participants who were fully compliant, predefined as attendance of at least three of the first six sessions and at least three other sessions. The analysis was repeated for participants who had attended at least one yoga session (i.e. any compliance), which included participants who were fully compliant. Each approach was described, including strengths and weaknesses, and the results of the different approaches were compared with those of the ITT analysis. RESULTS: For the participants who were fully compliant (n=93, 60%), a larger beneficial treatment effect was seen using CACE analysis compared with per-protocol, on-treatment and ITT analyses at 3 and 12 months. The difference in mean change in RMDQ score between randomised groups was -3.30 [95% confidence interval (CI) -4.90 to -1.70, P
机译:研究设计:方法学研究嵌套在一项针对慢性下背痛的瑜伽多中心随机对照试验(RCT)和常规全科医生(GP)与常规GP护理之间。目的:探讨在RCT中评估瑜伽下腰痛的三种方法中不依从的治疗效果。背景数据摘要:使用意向性治疗(ITT)分析的大型多中心RCT发现,向慢性下腰痛的参与者提供了12周的渐进式瑜伽加常规GP护理,其背部功能比常规提供的更好全科医生护理。但是,ITT分析可能会低估对依从性治疗者的治疗效果。因此,使用其他方法分析了数据以评估不合规问题。主要结局指标是自我报告的《罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷》(RMDQ)。方法:对完全依从的参与者的数据进行了符合标准的平均因果效应(CACE)分析,按方案分析和治疗时分析,这些参与者的数据预定义为前六届至少有三场参加,另外三届至少有三届参加。对于至少参加过一次瑜伽课程(即任何合规)的参与者重复分析,其中包括完全合规的参与者。描述了每种方法,包括优点和缺点,并将不同方法的结果与ITT分析的结果进行了比较。结果:对于完全依从的参与者(n = 93,60%),与按方案,治疗中和ITT分析相比,在3个月和12个月时,使用CACE分析观察到更大的有益治疗效果。随机分组之间RMDQ得分的平均变化差异为-3.30 [95%置信区间(CI)-4.90至-1.70,P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号