首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of decontamination methods used for dental burs
【2h】

A comparison of decontamination methods used for dental burs

机译:用于牙科钻头的去污方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: This study investigated the bacterial and fungal contamination of used dental burs. A novel assay system for comparison of efficacy of pre-sterilisation cleaning techniques for dental burs was used to evaluate manual scrubbing, enzymic agents and washer-disinfectors. Methods: Thirty dental burs contaminated during cavity preparation were analysed for micro-biological total viable counts and species of bacteria and fungi present. To simulate clinically contaminated burs, a culture of Streptococcus sanguis NCTC 7863 was used to inoculate unused dental burs, alone and combined with blood, saliva or a mixture of blood and saliva. Contaminated burs were subjected to six pre-sterilisation cleaning techniques and the log reduction in contamination achieved by each method was assessed. Results: The microbial count from used dental burs ranged from 0 to 6.92×10 4 CFU ml -1. Many potentially pathogenic species were identified. The decontamination assay demonstrated that autoclaving alone was not sufficient to sterilise dental burs. Manual scrubbing in air was less efficacious than manual scrubbing under water (p
机译:目的:这项研究调查了用过的牙钻的细菌和真菌污染。一种用于比较牙垢消毒前清洁技术功效的新颖测定系统,用于评估人工擦洗,酶制剂和清洗消毒器。方法:分析了在制腔过程中被污染的30个牙钻的微生物总生存量以及所存在的细菌和真菌的种类。为了模拟临床上受污染的牙钻,将血链球菌NCTC 7863培养物单独接种并与血液,唾液或血液和唾液的混合物一起接种未使用的牙钻。受污染的钻针经过六种预消毒清洁技术,并评估了每种方法所实现的污染对数减少。结果:使用过的牙钻的微生物计数范围为0到6.92×10 4 CFU ml -1。确定了许多潜在的致病物种。净化试验表明,仅进行高压灭菌不足以对牙钻进行灭菌。空气中的手动洗涤比水下的手动洗涤效率低(p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号