首页> 外文OA文献 >Entre mobilité et sédentarité : les Mising, « peuple du fleuve », face à l'endiguement du Brahmapoutre (Assam, Inde du Nord-Est)
【2h】

Entre mobilité et sédentarité : les Mising, « peuple du fleuve », face à l'endiguement du Brahmapoutre (Assam, Inde du Nord-Est)

机译:在流动性和认同性之间:mising,“河流人”,面对雅鲁藏布江(阿萨姆邦,印度东北部)的遏制

摘要

Natural disasters in Northeast India and in the rest of the world regularly attract media’s attention. Besides an emergency response to these events, it is necessary to distance oneself from the disaster in order to acquire a better understanding of the cause of the events and the coping strategies adopted by the population. Following on an interdisciplinary approach combining disciplines such as hydro-geomorphology, eco-anthropology and political ecology, this thesis sheds new light on the dynamics of the Brahmaputra River, the socio-environmental interactions and risk management in an area where few studies have been conducted.In Assam, every year during the monsoon, the level of the Brahmaputra River rises and overflows into the floodplain, covering sandy land and carrying fertile silts. In this densely populated area, the Mising tribe - a group from the eastern Himalayas, a scheduled tribe of Assam - has for long time managed to adapt its way of life to this dynamic environment. The Misings practise several types of rice cultivation; use different fishing techniques and move their villages according to the flow of the braided river’s channels. However, in 1950, a major earthquake brought about important modifications in the river’s hydrosystem, seriously upsetting this fragile socio-ecological system. Embankments have been built and land has been administrated on the south bank of the Brahmaputra since the twelfth century to control the river and to establish territories. But since 1954, the State of Assam has extended the embankments on both sides of the river. These infrastructures have encouraged farming communities to settle on these new protected lands, forcing them to respect cadastral boundaries. However, since 1988, breaches in the embankment have frequently led to flash floods, while erosion has caused land belonging to several villages in Majuli, Bokakhat and Dhakuakhana subdivisions, which are discussed in this thesis, to be washed away. The main objective of this thesis is to demonstrate — using examples from these three territories — how river engineering and rigid administrative boundaries have led to a social and environmental crisis that leaves the Misings no option but to adjust their agricultural practices and to adopt various strategies to negotiate their space on Assamese land and within Assamese society. Thus, in Bokakhat, the Misings negotiate their right to access resources with the Kaziranga National Park authorities; in Majuli, they work as farmers for Vaishnavite religious institutions and Assamese landowners; in Dhakuakhana, some of them take shelter illegally on portions of the embankment in the hope that their land will be restored to them, while others choose to migrate. In these distinct socio-economical conditions, they are divided into those who are assimilated into Assamese society through Vaishnavite cults, those who have converted to Christianity, which is gaining a foothold in the globalized world, and those who defend their tribal identity and who are reviving ancient faith. Finally, Mising political organizations are claiming to the State of Assam and to Delhi for more territorial autonomy. This would be a difficult undertaking as their villages are scattered among the other communities of Assam. To what extent these strategies will help the Misings to maintain their adaptability in a changing environment?
机译:印度东北部和世界其他地区的自然灾害经常引起媒体的关注。除了对这些事件的应急响应之外,有必要使自己远离灾难,以便更好地了解事件的成因和民众采取的应对策略。在结合水文地貌学,生态人类学和政治生态学等学科的跨学科方法之后,本论文为布拉马普特拉河的动力,社会环境相互作用和风险管理等方面的研究提供了新的思路。在阿萨姆邦,每年的季风期间,布拉马普特拉河的水位会上升并泛滥成洪泛滥,覆盖沙地并携带肥沃的淤泥。在这个人口稠密的地区,Mising部落-来自喜马拉雅山脉东部的一群人,这是阿萨姆邦的一个预定部落-长期以来一直设法使其生活方式适应这种动态环境。 Misings从事几种水稻种植。使用不同的捕鱼技术,并根据编织河道的流量移动村庄。但是,在1950年,一场大地震使河流的水系发生了重大变化,严重破坏了这个脆弱的社会生态系统。自十二世纪以来,已在布拉马普特拉南岸修建了堤防,并进行了土地管理,以控制河流并建立领土。但是自1954年以来,阿萨姆邦已将河两岸的堤防扩展了。这些基础设施鼓励农业社区在这些新的保护地上定居,迫使他们尊重地籍界限。但是,自1988年以来,路堤的破坏经常导致山洪泛滥,而侵蚀使属于马祖里,博卡哈特和达卡哈卡纳分区的几个村庄的土地被冲走了,这些土地在本文中进行了讨论。本论文的主要目的是通过使用这三个地区的例子来说明,河流工程和严格的行政边界如何导致社会和环境危机,使Misings别无选择,只能调整其农业实践并采取各种策略来解决这一问题。在阿萨姆人的土地上和在阿萨姆社会中谈判他们的空间。因此,在博卡哈特,明子人与卡齐兰加国家公园当局谈判了获取资源的权利;在Majuli,他们是Vaishnavite宗教机构和Assamese地主的农民。在达卡哈纳(Dhakuakhana),其中一些人非法在路堤的某些地方避难,以期将土地归还给他们,而另一些人则选择迁移。在这些独特的社会经济条件下,他们分为那些通过Vaishnavite邪教被阿萨姆社会所同化的人,那些已经to依基督教并在全球化世界中站稳脚跟的人,以及捍卫自己的部落身份和恢复古代信仰。最后,正在崛起的政治组织向阿萨姆邦和德里声称拥有更多的领土自治权。由于他们的村庄分散在阿萨姆邦的其他社区中,因此这将是一项艰巨的任务。这些策略将在多大程度上帮助Misings在不断变化的环境中保持适应性?

著录项

  • 作者

    CREMIN Emilie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号