首页> 外文OA文献 >Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning
【2h】

Individual Differences in Phonological Feedback Effects: Evidence for the Orthographic Recoding Hypothesis of Orthographic Learning

机译:语音反馈效应的个体差异:正交学习的正交记录假设的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Share (1995) has proposed phonological recoding (the translation of letters into sounds) as a self-teaching mechanism through which readers establish complete lexical representations. More recently, McKague et al. (2008) proposed a similar role for orthographic recoding, i.e., feedback from sounds to letters, in building and refining lexical representations. We reasoned that an interaction between feedback consistency measures and spelling ability in a spelling decision experiment would lend support to this hypothesis. In a linear mixed effects logistic regression of accuracy data this interaction was significant. Better spellers but not poorer spellers were immune to feedback effects in deciding if a word is spelled correctly, which is consistent with McKague et al.’s prediction that the impact of phonological feedback on word recognition will diminish when the orthographic representation for an item is fully specified. The study demonstrates the importance of considering individual differences when investigating the role of phonology in reading.
机译:Share(1995)提出了语音重新编码(将字母转换为声音)作为一种自学机制,通过这种机制读者可以建立完整的词汇表述。最近,McKague等。 (2008年)提出了正交拼写编码的类似作用,即从声音到字母的反馈,在建立和完善词汇表述中。我们认为,拼写决策实验中反馈一致性度量和拼写能力之间的相互作用将为这一假设提供支持。在准确性数据的线性混合效应逻辑回归中,这种相互作用是显着的。更好的拼写者而不是较差的拼写者可以在决定单词是否正确拼写时不受反馈影响,这与McKague等人的预测一致,即当正字表示形式为语音时,语音反馈对单词识别的影响将减弱完全指定。该研究表明,在研究语音学在阅读中的作用时,考虑个人差异的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号