首页> 外文OA文献 >How Do You Rate Your Lawyer?: Lawyers’ Responses to Online Reviews of Their Services
【2h】

How Do You Rate Your Lawyer?: Lawyers’ Responses to Online Reviews of Their Services

机译:您如何评价您的律师?:律师对其服务在线评论的回应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the proliferation of opportunities for consumers to review a variety of services on the Internet, it is probably only a matter of time until more clients review their attorneys’ services on the Internet. This raises a variety of potential ethical and public policy issues that will be discussed in this article. First, what can attorneys do to try to control their on-line reputations? Second, if a client posts negative comments about an attorney’s services on a public Internet forum, can the attorney respond on that forum without breaching the duty of confidentiality and, if so, how? Finally, when settling a dispute with a client, can an attorney put a provision in a settlement agreement that prohibits a client from posting any reviews of the lawyer’s services on the Internet? This article will address each of these questions in light of normative considerations, the rules governing lawyers’ conduct, clients’ interest in confidentiality and loyalty, lawyers’ reputational interests, and public policy concerns about consumers’ access to accurate information about legal services.
机译:随着消费者查看Internet上各种服务的机会激增,越来越多的客户在Internet上查看其律师的服务可能只是时间问题。这引发了各种潜在的道德和公共政策问题,本文将对此进行讨论。首先,律师可以做些什么来试图控制他们的在线声誉?其次,如果客户在公共互联网论坛上发表了关于律师服务的负面评论,那么律师可以在不违反保密义务的情况下在该论坛上做出回应吗?最后,当与客户解决争议时,律师是否可以在和解协议中加入一项条款,以禁止客户在互联网上发布对律师服务的任何评论?本文将根据规范性考虑因素,管理律师行为的规则,客户对机密性和忠诚度的兴趣,律师的声誉利益以及有关消费者能否获得有关法律服务的准确信息的公共政策方面的关注点,来解决每个问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rigertas Laurel A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号