首页> 外文OA文献 >Literacy in a social media culture : an ethnographic study of literary communication pratices
【2h】

Literacy in a social media culture : an ethnographic study of literary communication pratices

机译:社交媒体文化中的识字:民族志研究或文学传播实践

摘要

Literacy is often considered a cornerstone of education that empowers people to participate in economic, social and cultural life. But what does it mean ―to be literate‖? Educational researchers, policy makers and teachers often feel tempted to present literacy as a fixed and universal set of skills, knowledge and attitudes (Livingstone, Bober, & Helsper, 2005; Buckingham, Banaji, Carr, Cranmer, & Willett, 2005). This conceptualization facilitates the construction of tests, benchmarks and teaching materials. However, scholars have demonstrated that literacy is not fixed or universal, but always situated in a social and cultural context (Street, 1993; Barton & Hamilton, 1998; Barton, Hamilton, & Ivanič, 2005). Based on this insight, they have questioned the dominant ―skills and benchmarks‖ approach in education which conceives literacy as neutral, monolithic and measurable (e.g. The New London Group, 1996; Gee, 2004). Scholars within New Literacies Studies2 have convincingly argued for an alternative approach to literacy in research, theory and education (see Street, 2003; Coiro, Knobel, Lankshear, & Leu, 2014).In the following sections of this introduction I will first present a brief overview of the empirical and theoretical insights that have contributed to the conception and development of New Literacies Studies. This analysis will also include a discussion of the two main questions that underlie much of the research from the New Literacies Studies tradition. In addition, I will focus more thoroughly on the historical connections between of literacy and media in general, and between literacy and literature in particular. In light of this discussion I will argue that the increasing ubiquity of social media presents a new opportunity for studying the transformations of literary culture and traditional print literacy. Finally, I will outline the research questions and focus of my research as well as the structure and argumentation of this dissertation.
机译:扫盲通常被认为是赋予人们参与经济,社会和文化生活能力的教育的基石。但是,“识字”是什么意思?教育研究人员,政策制定者和教师经常倾向于将扫盲呈现为一套固定的,普遍的技能,知识和态度(Livingstone,Bober和Helsper,2005年;白金汉,Banaji,Carr,Cranmer和Willett,2005年)。这种概念化有助于构建测试,基准和教材。但是,学者们证明扫盲不是固定的或普遍的,而是始终处于社会和文化背景中(Street,1993; Barton&Hamilton,1998; Barton,Hamilton&Ivanič,2005)。基于这一见解,他们对教育中占主导地位的“技能和基准”方法提出了质疑,该方法将素养视为中立,整体且可衡量(例如,新伦敦集团,1996年;吉,2004年)。在《新文艺研究》 2中的学者们令人信服地提出了在研究,理论和教育领域扫盲的另一种方法(见Street,2003; Coiro,Knobel,Lankshear和Leu,2014)。对有助于新文学研究的概念和发展的经验和理论见解的简要概述。该分析还将包括对两个主要问题的讨论,这些问题是新文学研究传统中许多研究的基础。此外,我将更全面地关注扫盲与一般媒体之间的历史联系,尤其是扫盲与文学之间的历史联系。根据这一讨论,我将认为社交媒体的日益普及为研究文学文化和传统印刷文化的转变提供了新的机会。最后,我将概述研究问题和研究重点,以及本论文的结构和论点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vlieghe Joachim;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:01:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号