首页> 外文OA文献 >The influence of demographics and household specific price indices on consumption based inequality and welfare : a comparison of Spain and the United States
【2h】

The influence of demographics and household specific price indices on consumption based inequality and welfare : a comparison of Spain and the United States

机译:人口统计和家庭特定价格指数对基于消费的不平等和福利的影响:西班牙和美国的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research suggests that income inequality is lower in Spain than in the U.S. This paper studies whether this ranking remains the same when household consumption expenditures are used as a proxy for household welfare. Both inequality and social welfare, as components of economic well-being, are examined. Total household expenditures from each country’s 1990-91 consumer expenditure survey are used as the basis for the analysis. For tractability, equivalence scales depend only on the number of people in the household and not any other demographic characteristic. Household specific price indices are used to express the 1990-91 expenditure distributions at winter of 1981 and winter of 1991 prices. Decomposable measurement instruments are used both for the inequality and social welfare analyses. Bootstrap methods are used to produce confidence intervals for all estimates. When consumption expenditures are substituted for income as the measure of economic well-being, the ranking of Spain and the U.S. varies as both household size and the equivalence scale adjustment change. When focusing on household size alone, inequality and welfare comparisons are drastically different for smaller and larger households. The income inequality ranking can only be maintained for expenditure distributions when economies of scale are assumed to be small or non-existent. However, welfare is always higher in the U.S. than in Spain. It is concluded that household demographic characteristics, as well as equivalence scale adjustments, can be very important in international comparisons. With regard to householdspecific relative price effects, inflation during the 1980s in both countries has been essentially neutral from a distributional point of view, so that all results are robust to the choice of time period.
机译:先前的研究表明,西班牙的收入不平等程度低于美国。本文研究了当家庭消费支出用作家庭福利的替代指标时,该排名是否保持不变。作为经济福祉的组成部分的不平等和社会福利都受到了审查。每个国家1990-91年消费者支出调查中的家庭总支出都用作分析的基础。对于易处理性,等效性量表仅取决于家庭中的人数,而不取决于其他任何人口特征。家庭特定价格指数用于表示1981年冬季和1991年冬季价格的1990-91年支出分布。可分解的测量工具用于不平等和社会福利分析。自举方法用于产生所有估计的置信区间。当用消费支出代替收入来衡量经济状况时,西班牙和美国的排名会随着家庭规模和当量规模调整的变化而变化。当仅关注家庭规模时,不平等和福利的比较对于较小的家庭和较大的家庭是截然不同的。仅在假定规模经济较小或根本不存在的情况下,才能为支出分配维持收入不平等排名。但是,美国的福利总比西班牙高。结论是,在国际比较中,家庭人口特征以及当量表的调整可能非常重要。关于家庭特定的相对价格影响,从分配的角度来看,两国在1980年代的通货膨胀率基本上是中性的,因此所有结果对于时间段的选择都是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号