首页> 外文OA文献 >EU conflict management policy: comparing the security-development model in the 'sui generis' cases of Northern Ireland and Kosovo
【2h】

EU conflict management policy: comparing the security-development model in the 'sui generis' cases of Northern Ireland and Kosovo

机译:欧盟冲突管理政策:比较北爱尔兰和科索沃“特殊”案件中的安全发展模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The EU has frequently presented Northern Ireland as a ‘model’ for conflict management, especially in the Balkans. The paper questions whether the EU had a strategic and coherent input into the Northern Ireland peace process through its Peace and Reconciliation Programs and argues that the rational logic of its actions hinged more on the goals of the Delors Commission for self-empowerment and competence expansion. Despite EU rhetoric, the development of EU conflict management instruments and policy since the late 1990s do not appear to be informed by the Northern Ireland ‘model’. Indeed, that model’s substantive elements – consociationalism, a lack of transitional justice, embedding sectarian structures – contravene EU norms of conflict management. The lack of transferable lesson-learning and the disjuncture between EU normative rhetoric about ‘multiethnicity’ and the realities of ethnic division are explored in the case of Kosovo.
机译:欧盟经常将北爱尔兰作为冲突管理的“典范”,特别是在巴尔干半岛。该文件质疑欧盟是否通过其《和平与和解计划》对北爱尔兰和平进程进行了战略性和连贯的投入,并认为其行动的合理逻辑更多地取决于德洛尔委员会实现自我授权和能力扩展的目标。尽管有欧盟的言论,但自1990年代后期以来欧盟冲突管理工具和政策的发展似乎并未受到北爱尔兰“模式”的启发。的确,该模式的实质性元素-联合主义,缺乏过渡司法,嵌入宗派结构-违反了欧盟的冲突管理规范。在科索沃一案中,人们探讨了缺乏可转移的经验教训,以及欧盟关于“多种族”的规范性言论与种族分裂现实之间的脱节。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hughes James;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号