首页> 外文OA文献 >International or transnational?: humanitarian action during the First World War
【2h】

International or transnational?: humanitarian action during the First World War

机译:是国际还是跨国?:第一次世界大战期间的人道主义行动

摘要

To what extent was a nascent international humanitarian sphere challenged by the rise of nationalist aid efforts during the First World War? How did wartime nationalisms influence humanitarian mobilisation? Taking the aid effort to prisoners of war as its central case study, this article contends that the similar evolution of national wartime charities in the different belligerent states was due to a transnational learning process, based on nationalism and reciprocity dynamics, rather than simply a manifestation of a shared culture of international humanitarianism. Comparing similar national aid actors in different countries highlights the fact that the national aid response did not develop solely as a result of 'international' norms, but often on the basis of other motivations, predominantly the desire to help the war effort. This transnational learning process has been identified in some historiographical analysis as evidence for the existence of shared international humanitarian norms within belligerent countries; in fact it is also evidence that certain welfare sectors - for example, registration of the missing and dead, military aid bureaucracies or local scouting or Red Cross associations - evolved similarly in response to the logistical challenges created by total war. This paper contends that the nationalist-orientated evolution of charity at the local level during the war created increasing tensions between the national and international humanitarian spheres and it argues that it is necessary to explore this contested evolution of wartime charity in order to understand the complex nature of wartime mobilisation.
机译:第一次世界大战期间,民族主义援助努力的兴起对新生的国际人道主义领域提出了何种挑战?战时民族主义如何影响人道主义动员?本文以对战俘的援助努力为中心案例研究,认为在不同交战国的国家战时慈善机构的类似演变,是由于跨国学习过程是建立在民族主义和互惠动态的基础上的,而不仅仅是一种表现形式一种国际人道主义的共同文化。比较不同国家的类似国家援助行为者,可以看出这样一个事实,即国家援助对策并不是仅仅由于“国际”规范而发展,而是常常基于其他动机,主要是帮助战争的愿望。在一些史学分析中已经确定了这种跨国学习过程,作为交战国内部存在共同的国际人道主义规范的证据;实际上,也有证据表明,某些福利部门(例如失踪人员和死亡者的登记,军事援助官僚机构或地方侦察或红十字会的注册)以类似的方式发展,以应对全面战争带来的后勤挑战。本文认为,战争期间在地方层面上以民族主义为导向的慈善事业的演变在国家和国际人道主义领域之间造成了越来越大的紧张关系,并认为有必要探索这种有争议的战时慈善事业的演变,以了解其复杂性。战时动员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones Heather;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号