首页> 外文OA文献 >Practical Quality Control: Comparision of Methods on the Quantification of Stationary Phases in Paper and Thin-Layer Chromatographic Systems
【2h】

Practical Quality Control: Comparision of Methods on the Quantification of Stationary Phases in Paper and Thin-Layer Chromatographic Systems

机译:实际质量控制:纸和薄层色谱系统固定相定量方法的比较

摘要

Introduction: Paper and thin layer chromatography methods are frequently used in Classic Nuclear Medicine for the determination of radiochemical purity (RCP) on radiopharmaceutical preparations. An aliquot of the radiopharmaceutical to be tested is spotted at the origin of a chromatographic strip (stationary phase), which in turn is placed in a chromatographic chamber in order to separate and quantify radiochemical species present in the radiopharmaceutical preparation. There are several methods for the RCP measurement, based on the use of equipment as dose calibrators, well scintillation counters, radiochromatografic scanners and gamma cameras. The purpose of this study was to compare these quantification methods for the determination of RCP.Material and Methods: 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 99mTc-HDP are the radiopharmaceuticals chosen to serve as the basis for this study. For the determination of RCP of 99mTc-Tetrofosmin we used ITLC-SG (2.5 x 10 cm) and 2-butanone (99mTc-tetrofosmin Rf = 0.55, 99mTcO4- Rf = 1.0, other labeled impurities 99mTc-RH RF = 0.0). For the determination of RCP of 99mTc-HDP, Whatman 31ET and acetone was used (99mTc-HDP Rf = 0.0, 99mTcO4- Rf = 1.0, other labeled impurities RF = 0.0). After the development of the solvent front, the strips were allowed to dry and then imaged on the gamma camera (256x256 matrix; zoom 2; LEHR parallel-hole collimator; 5-minute image) and on the radiochromatogram scanner. Then, strips were cut in Rf 0.8 in the case of 99mTc-tetrofosmin and Rf 0.5 in the case of 99mTc-HDP. The resultant pieces were smashed in an assay tube (to minimize the effect of counting geometry) and counted in the dose calibrator and in the well scintillation counter (during 1 minute). The RCP was calculated using the formula: % 99mTc-Complex = [(99mTc-Complex) / (Total amount of 99mTc-labeled species)] x 100. Statistical analysis was done using the test of hypotheses for the difference between means in independent samples.Results:The gamma camera based method demonstrated higher operator-dependency (especially concerning the drawing of the ROIs) and the measures obtained using the dose calibrator are very sensitive to the amount of activity spotted in the chromatographic strip, so the use of a minimum of 3.7 MBq activity is essential to minimize quantification errors. Radiochromatographic scanner and well scintillation counter showed concordant results and demonstrated the higher level of precision.Conclusions: Radiochromatographic scanners and well scintillation counters based methods demonstrate to be the most accurate and less operator-dependant methods.
机译:简介:经典核医学中经常使用纸和薄层色谱法测定放射性药物制剂的放射化学纯度(RCP)。将待测放射性药物的等分试样放在色谱条的起点(固定相)上,然后将其放置在色谱室中,以分离和定量存在于放射性药物制剂中的放射性化学物质。基于使用设备作为剂量校准器,阱闪烁计数器,放射色谱仪和伽马相机,RCP测量有几种方法。这项研究的目的是比较测定RCP的定量方法。材料与方法:99mTc-Tetrofosmin和99mTc-HDP是作为本研究基础的放射性药物。为了测定99mTc-四磷灵的RCP,我们使用了ITLC-SG(2.5 x 10 cm)和2-丁酮(99mTc-四磷灵Rf = 0.55,99mTcO4- Rf = 1.0,其他标记的杂质99mTc-RH RF = 0.0)。为了测定99mTc-HDP的RCP,使用了Whatman 31ET和丙酮(99mTc-HDP Rf = 0.0,99mTcO4- Rf = 1.0,其他标记的杂质RF = 0.0)。溶剂前沿显影后,将条带干燥,然后在伽马相机(256x256矩阵;变焦2; LEHR平行孔准直仪; 5分钟图像)和放射色谱扫描仪上成像。然后,在99mTc-四磷灵的情况下,将条带切成Rf 0.8,在99mTc-HDP的情况下,将条带切成Rf 0.5。将所得的碎片在测定管中捣碎(以最大程度地减少计数几何的影响),并在剂量校准器和孔闪烁计数器中计数(1分钟内)。使用以下公式计算RCP:%99mTc-Complex = [(99mTc-Complex)/(99mTc标记的物种总数)x100。使用假设检验检验独立样本中均值之间的差异,进行统计分析。结果:基于伽马相机的方法显示出更高的操作员依赖性(特别是关于ROI的绘制),并且使用剂量校准器获得的测量值对色谱带上发现的活性量非常敏感,因此使用最少的3.7 MBq的活度对于最小化量化误差至关重要。放射色谱扫描仪和孔闪烁计数器显示出一致的结果,并显示出更高的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号