首页> 外文OA文献 >Detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis using real time PCR, immunocapture assay, PNA FISH and standard culture methods in different types of food samples
【2h】

Detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis using real time PCR, immunocapture assay, PNA FISH and standard culture methods in different types of food samples

机译:使用实时PCR,免疫捕获测定,PNA FISH和标准培养方法在不同类型的食物样品中检测肠炎沙门氏菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Several methods for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella in food samples have been described. Here, we compare 4 of those methods in terms of assay time, procedure complexity, detection limit, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Milk, eggs and mayonnaise samples were artificially contaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis cell concentrations ranging from 1 × 10- 2 to 1 × 102 CFU per 25 g or ml of food. Samples were then pre-enriched and analyzed by either: i) real-time PCR, using the iQ-Check Salmonella kit; ii) immunocapture, using the RapidChek SELECT Salmonella; iii) a peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) method and iv) the traditional bacteriological method ISO 6579:2002. All methods were able to detect Salmonella in the different types of food matrixes and presented a similar detection level of 1 CFU per 25 g or ml of food sample. The immunocapture and the PNA FISH methods proved to be very reliable, as their results were 100% in agreement with the ISO method. However, real-time PCR presented a significant number of false positives, which resulted in a specificity of 55.6% (CI 95%, 31.3 – 77.6) and an accuracy of 82.2%(CI 95%, 63.2 – 91.4) for this method. Sensitivity was 100% since no false negative results were observed. In conclusion, the implementation of these molecular techniques, mainly the immunocapture and PNA-FISH methods, provides a reliable and less time-consuming alternative for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food samples.
机译:已经描述了几种快速和特异性检测食品样品中沙门氏菌的方法。在这里,我们在测定时间,程序复杂度,检测限,灵敏度,特异性和准确性方面比较了其中4种方法。牛奶,鸡蛋和蛋黄酱样品被肠沙门氏菌肠炎沙门氏菌细胞浓度每25克或毫升1×10-2至1×102 CFU人工污染。然后对样品进行预富集,并通过以下方法之一进行分析:i)使用iQ-Check沙门氏菌试剂盒进行实时PCR; ii)使用RapidChek SELECT沙门氏菌进行免疫捕获; iii)肽核酸荧光原位杂交(PNA FISH)方法,以及iv)传统的细菌学方法ISO 6579:2002。所有方法都能够在不同类型的食物基质中检测沙门氏菌,并且每25克或每毫升食物样品的检测水平为1 CFU。免疫捕获和PNA FISH方法证明是非常可靠的,因为它们的结果与ISO方法一致,为100%。但是,实时PCR呈现大量假阳性,导致该方法的特异性为55.6%(CI 95%,31.3 – 77.6),准确性为82.2%(CI 95%,63.2 – 91.4)。灵敏度为100%,因为未观察到假阴性结果。总之,这些分子技术(主要是免疫捕获和PNA-FISH方法)的实施为沙门氏菌的检测提供了可靠且耗时较少的替代方法。在食物样本中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号