首页> 外文OA文献 >Self-regulation of internet intermediaries: public duty versus private responsibility
【2h】

Self-regulation of internet intermediaries: public duty versus private responsibility

机译:互联网中介的自我监管:公共职责与私人职责

摘要

Internet intermediaries – the social media companies, search engines and internet service providers who supply ways for audiences to find and access online content – are under scrutiny regarding their crucial role in the flow of digital information. Google and Facebook attracted one fifth of global advertising spend in 2016, and concerns have been raised about these companies’ increasing dominance. An event earlier this month hosted by the LSE Media Policy Project addressed the issue of intermediary liability for content and how policy makers should respond. Paul Bernal of the University of East Anglia spoke about the concept of public duty in relation to intermediaries; the following post is based on his remarks.
机译:互联网中介机构(为受众提供查找和访问在线内容的途径的社交媒体公司,搜索引擎和互联网服务提供商)正在受到审查,以了解它们在数字信息流中的关键作用。 Google和Facebook在2016年吸引了全球广告支出的五分之一,人们对这些公司的主导地位越来越感到担忧。由LSE媒体政策项目在本月早些时候举办的一次活动解决了内容的中间责任问题以及政策制定者应如何应对。东英吉利大学的保罗·伯纳尔(Paul Bernal)谈到了与中介机构有关的公共职责概念。以下帖子是基于他的言论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bernal Paul;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号