首页> 外文OA文献 >Migration and validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe: inclusion, exclusion or polarisation in the recognition of skills?
【2h】

Migration and validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe: inclusion, exclusion or polarisation in the recognition of skills?

机译:欧洲非正规和非正式学习的迁移和验证:技能认可中的包容,排斥或两极分化?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article explores (1) the degree to which immigrants can be considered dominant groups in the area of validation of non-formal and informal learning and are subject to specific validation measures in 33 European countries; (2) whether country clusters can be identified within Europe with regard to the dominance of immigrants in the area of validation; and (3) whether validation systems are likely to lead to the inclusion of immigrants or foster a process of “devaluation” of their skills and competences in their host countries. Based on the European Inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning project (chiefly its 2014 update) as well as a review of 124 EU-funded (Lifelong Learning Programme and European Social Fund) validation projects, the authors present the following findings: (1) in the majority of European countries, immigrants are not a dominant group in the area of validation. (2) In terms of country clusters, Central European and Nordic countries tend to consider immigrants a dominant target group for validation to a greater extent than Southern and Eastern European countries. (3) Finally, few initiatives aim to ensure that immigrants’ skills and competences are not devalued in their host country, and those initiatives which are in place benefit particularly those defined as “highly skilled” individuals, on the basis of their productive potential. There is, thus, a “low road” and a “high road” to validation, leading to a process of polarisation in the recognition of the skills and competences of immigrants
机译:本文探讨(1)在33个欧洲国家/地区中,可以将移民视为非正规和非正式学习验证领域中的主导群体的程度,并应接受特定的验证措施; (2)是否可以在欧洲范围内确定在验证领域中移民的主导地位的国家群; (3)验证系统是否有可能导致移民的融入或促进他们在东道国的技能和能力“贬值”的过程。基于欧洲非正规和非正规学习项目验证清单(主要是其2014年更新),以及对124个欧盟资助的(终身学习计划和欧洲社会基金)验证项目的审查,作者提出以下发现: (1)在大多数欧洲国家/地区中,移民在验证方面不是主导群体。 (2)就国家集群而言,中欧和北欧国家倾向于比南部和东欧国家更多地将移民视为主要的目标人群。 (3)最后,很少有旨在确保移民的技能和能力在其所在国不贬值的倡议,而这些倡议根据其生产潜力特别有利于那些被定义为“高技能”人士的倡议。因此,有一条“走低路”和“一条走高路”来进行验证,从而导致在承认移民的技能和能力方面出现两极化的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号