首页> 外文OA文献 >Re-examining Herbert Schiller’s cultural imperialism thesis with cases of chinese and korean cultural industries and China’s quest for soft power: A comparative study of chinese film and online gaming industries’ going-out efforts
【2h】

Re-examining Herbert Schiller’s cultural imperialism thesis with cases of chinese and korean cultural industries and China’s quest for soft power: A comparative study of chinese film and online gaming industries’ going-out efforts

机译:重新审视赫伯特·席勒(Herbert Schiller)的文化帝国主义论点,并以中韩文化产业为例,以及中国对软实力的追求:对中国电影和网络游戏产业的不懈努力进行的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

First essay: In the climate of a new orthodoxy foregrounding de-centralization and cultural diversification in globalization since the 1990s, Herbert Schilleru27s theory of cultural imperialism has been largely discredited in communication studies. Schilleru27s cultural account of U.S. imperialism is considered unsatisfactory for explaining emerging markets and rapid developments in global cultural industries. Both the Korean wave and the rise of China’s soft power seem to support this proposition. This article goes back to Schilleru27s thesis with the challenge represented in the successes of China and Korea. To be sure, real-world developments and current global power shifts challenge Schiller’s state-centric analysis of “imperialism”. However, Schilleru27s core-periphery framing of “domination” and “subordination” in power relations is still adaptable to todayu27s environment. Additionally, his observation of the global cultural dominance of transnational corporate authorities and their dependence on class exploitation remains valid. Cultural imperialism successors need to account for both the state and class relations when studying contemporary cultural and economic exchanges among established powers and new powers. Second essay: China’s rapid growth over the last several decades has reshaped the international economic and political order. Against the backdrop of ongoing global power shifts, China’s steps to develop and increase its soft power have attracted immense attention. This essay continues Yuezhi Zhao’s study of global power shifts and communication in China by locating China’s quest for soft power within its historical and geopolitical contexts and addressing the complexities of Chinese cultural industries’ global integration through a political economy of communication (Zhao, 2013; Zhao, 2014). This analysis foregrounds the identical nature of capital accumulation in the domestic and global developments of China’s film and online gaming industries. If China’s cultural revitalization is to be understood as offering an alternative to the current capitalist order, then the global commercial expansion of China’s online gaming and film industries do not represent soft power breakthroughs. Rather, they represent the market imperatives and business strategies underpinning China’s cultural integration into global capitalism.
机译:第一篇文章:自1990年代以来,在全球化正趋于下放权力和文化多元化的新正统氛围中,赫伯特·席勒(Herbert Schiller)的文化帝国主义理论在传播学研究中被大大抹黑。席勒对美帝国主义的文化解释被认为不能令人满意地解释新兴市场和全球文化产业的快速发展。韩流和中国软实力的崛起似乎都支持这一主张。本文以席勒的论文为背景,以中国和韩国的成功为代表。可以肯定的是,现实世界的发展和当前的全球力量转移都对席勒对“帝国主义”的以国家为中心的分析提出了挑战。但是,席勒在权力关系中“支配”和“从属”的核心外围框架仍然适用于当今的环境。此外,他对跨国公司机构的全球文化主导地位及其对阶级剥削的依赖的观察仍然有效。文化帝国主义的后继者在研究既有大国与新大国之间的当代文化和经济交流时,必须考虑国家和阶级的关系。第二篇文章:中国过去几十年的快速增长重塑了国际经济和政治秩序。在全球力量不断转移的背景下,中国发展和增强软实力的步骤引起了极大的关注。本文通过将中国对软实力的追求定位在其历史和地缘政治背景下,并通过传播的政治经济学解决中国文化产业全球整合的复杂性,继续赵悦之对中国全球权力转移和传播的研究(Zhao,2013; Zhao ,2014)。该分析预测了中国电影和网络游戏产业在国内外发展中资本积累的相同性质。如果将中国的文化振兴理解为是对当前资本主义秩序的替代,那么中国在线游戏和电影产业的全球商业扩张并不代表软实力的突破。相反,它们代表了支撑中国文化融入全球资本主义的市场需求和商业策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhang Yuji;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号