首页> 外文OA文献 >Resolving the paradox of location in a global economy: cluster facilitation and network management in the biotechnology sector
【2h】

Resolving the paradox of location in a global economy: cluster facilitation and network management in the biotechnology sector

机译:解决全球经济中的区位悖论:生物技术领域的集群促进和网络管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Cluster policy is at the crossroads as governments widely support the local agglomeration of companies and research institutes, but success or failure seems arbitrary for those ‘Silicon Somewheres’. Faced with limited proof of ‘what works’ for clusters, frustration is spreading among policy makers and stakeholders. The study offers a comparative analysis of high-technology clusters around the globe with the objective of finding a generalizable mechanism for making cluster policy successful. Interviews conducted with officials, researchers and industry stakeholders in Chicago, Copenhagen, Singapore and Vancouver reveal that networks have found a novel way of cluster support by having a ‘facilitator’. This network management institution or individual is able to connect and support cluster stakeholders while simultaneously linking them to government with the goal of better tailored policy and ultimately more successful innovative processes. The dissertation offers a new theoretical framework for investigating the facilitation mechanism based on intersecting science and technology policy, network management and innovation systems literature. The study highlights the fact that the key to success is the creation of capacity for networking (collaborative capacity) and identifying useful knowledge, knowledge gaps and future developments (absorptive capacity) rather than focusing solely on output. The central findings are threefold: Not only does facilitation exist in different parts of the world, it also enhances performance and varies depending on location. The variations include a government- and stakeholder-funded model in most European countries, an independent model in North America and finally, a government-financed model in Asia.
机译:随着政府广泛支持公司和研究机构在当地的集聚,集群政策正处于十字路口,但是对于那些“ Silicon Somewheres”而言,成功或失败似乎是武断的。面对集群“行之有效”的有限证据,沮丧情绪正在决策者和利益相关者之间蔓延。该研究提供了对全球高科技集群的比较分析,目的是找到使集群政策成功的通用机制。在芝加哥,哥本哈根,新加坡和温哥华与官员,研究人员和行业利益相关者进行的访谈显示,网络已经有了“促进者”,找到了一种新型的集群支持方式。该网络管理机构或个人能够连接和支持集群利益相关者,同时将他们与政府联系起来,以期制定更好的量身定制的政策,并最终实现更成功的创新流程。论文基于科学技术政策,网络管理和创新系统文献相交,为促进机制的研究提供了新的理论框架。该研究强调了一个事实,即成功的关键是建立网络能力(协作能力)并确定有用的知识,知识差距和未来发展(吸收能力),而不是仅仅关注产出。主要发现有三点:便利不仅存在于世界的不同地方,它还可以提高绩效,并且因地点而异。差异包括大多数欧洲国家的政府和利益相关者资助的模型,北美的独立模型以及亚洲的政府资助模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Giest Sarah Nadine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号