首页> 外文OA文献 >Glasgow's spatial arrangement of deprivation over time: methods to measure it and meanings for health
【2h】

Glasgow's spatial arrangement of deprivation over time: methods to measure it and meanings for health

机译:格拉斯哥的贫困随时间推移的空间排列:衡量贫困的方法及其对健康的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Socio-economic deprivation is a key driver of population health. High levels of socio-economic deprivation have long been offered as the explanation for exceptionally high levels of mortality in Glasgow, Scotland. A number of recent studies have, however, suggested that this explanation is partial. Comparisons with Liverpool and Manchester suggest that mortality rates have been higher in Glasgow since the 1970s despite very similar levels of deprivation in these three cities. It has, therefore, been argued that there is an “excess” of mortality in Glasgow; that is, mortality rates are higher than would be expected given the city’s age, gender, and deprivation profile. A profusion of possible explanations for this excess has been proffered. One hypothesis is that the spatial arrangement of deprivation might be a contributing factor. Particular spatial configurations of deprivation have been associated with negative health impacts. It has been suggested that Glasgow experienced a distinct, and more harmful, development of spatial patterning of deprivation. Measuring the development of spatial arrangements of deprivation over time is technically challenging however. Therefore, this study brought together a number of techniques to compare the development of the spatial arrangement of deprivation in Glasgow, Liverpool and Manchester between 1971 and 2011. It then considered the plausibility of the spatial arrangement of deprivation as a contributing factor to Glasgow’s high levels of mortality.udMethods: A literature review was undertaken to inform understandings of relationships between the spatial arrangement of deprivation and health outcomes. A substantial element of this study involved developing a methodology to facilitate temporal and inter-city comparisons of the spatial arrangement of deprivation. Key contributions of this study were the application of techniques to render and quantify whole-landscape perspectives on the development of spatial patterns of household deprivation, over time. This was achieved by using surface mapping techniques to map information relating to deprivation from the UK census, and then analysing these maps with spatial metrics. ududResults:udThere is agreement in the literature that the spatial arrangement of deprivation can influence health outcomes, but mechanisms and expected impacts are not clear. The temporal development of Glasgow’s spatial arrangement of deprivation exhibited both similarities and differences with Liverpool and Manchester. Glasgow often had a larger proportion of its landscape occupied with areas of deprivation, particularly in 1971 and 1981. Patch density and mean patch size (spatial metrics which provide an indication of fragmentation), however, were not found to have developed differently in Glasgow. ududConclusion:udThe spatial extent of deprivation developed differently in Glasgow relative to Liverpool and Manchester as the results indicated that deprivation was substantially more spatially prevalent in Glasgow, this was particularly pronounced in 1971 and 1981. This implies that exposure of more affluent and deprived people to each other has been greater in Glasgow. Given that proximal inequality has been related to poor health outcomes, it would appear plausible that this may have adversely affected Glasgow’s mortality rates. If this is the case, however, it is unlikely that this will account for a substantial proportion of Glasgow’s excess mortality. Further research into Glasgow’s excess mortality is, therefore, required.
机译:背景:社会经济匮乏是人口健康的主要驱动力。长期以来,人们一直以高度的社会经济剥夺来解释苏格兰格拉斯哥的极高死亡率。但是,最近的一些研究表明,这种解释是不完整的。与利物浦和曼彻斯特的比较表明,自1970年代以来,格拉斯哥的死亡率一直较高,尽管这三个城市的贫困程度非常相似。因此,有人认为格拉斯哥的死亡率“过高”。也就是说,死亡率高于城市的年龄,性别和贫困状况。已经提供了关于这种过量的可能解释的大量信息。一种假设是,贫困的空间排列可能是一个促成因素。剥夺的特殊空间形态已对健康产生负面影响。有人提出,格拉斯哥经历了一种独特的,更加有害的剥夺空间格局发展。然而,随着时间的推移,衡量剥夺空间安排的发展在技术上具有挑战性。因此,这项研究汇集了许多技术,以比较1971年至2011年之间在格拉斯哥,利物浦和曼彻斯特的贫困空间布局的发展。然后,它认为贫困空间布局的合理性是造成格拉斯哥高层居住的原因 udMethods:进行了文献综述,以了解对贫困的空间布局与健康结果之间关系的理解。这项研究的重要内容涉及开发一种方法,以促进对贫困的空间安排进行时间和城市间比较。这项研究的主要贡献是随着时间的推移,应用技术来渲染和量化关于家庭贫困空间格局发展的全景观观点。这是通过使用表面测绘技术来绘制与英国人口普查剥夺有关的信息,然后使用空间度量分析这些地图来实现的。 ud ud结果: ud文献中一致认为,剥夺的空间排列会影响健康结果,但机制和预期影响尚不清楚。格拉斯哥贫困地区的时间安排与利物浦和曼彻斯特既有相似之处,也有不同之处。格拉斯哥的景观经常被贫困地区所占据,尤其是在1971年和1981年。斑块密度和平均斑块大小(提供碎片迹象的空间度量)在格拉斯哥并未发现不同的发展。 ud ud结论: ud相对于利物浦和曼彻斯特,格拉斯哥的贫困程度有所不同,因为结果表明,格拉斯哥的贫困在空间上更为普遍,这在1971年和1981年尤为明显。这意味着暴露于更富裕在格拉斯哥,彼此之间被剥夺的人民更多了。考虑到近端不平等与健康状况不佳有关,因此这可能会对格拉斯哥的死亡率产生不利影响。但是,如果真是这样,这不太可能占格拉斯哥超额死亡率的很大一部分。因此,需要对格拉斯哥的过高死亡率进行进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stewart Joanna L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号