首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of representations of nature of Science and indigenous knowledge systems in South African Grade 9 Natural Science textbooks
【2h】

Analysis of representations of nature of Science and indigenous knowledge systems in South African Grade 9 Natural Science textbooks

机译:分析南非9年级自然科学教科书中科学和土著知识系统的性质的表示形式

摘要

This study analyzed representations of Nature of Science (NOS) and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in three South Africa Grade 9 Natural Science textbooks. The textbooks were purposefully selected from a possibility of ten textbooks available on the public market and used in science classrooms in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. The aim of the analysis was to determine the extent to which both NOS and IKS were represented and to ascertain whether the representations were: naïve or informed; and implicit or explicit. The content analysis of the textbooks was based on adaptations of analytical frameworks developed by Akerson, Abd-El-Khalick and Lederman (2000) for NOS and Ninnes (2000) for IKS, respectively. For NOS the analysis focused on seven tenets, which are; science is empirical, the difference between observation and inference, functions and relations between theories and laws, the role of creativity and imagination in science, the tentativeness of scientific knowledge, the social and cultural embeddedness of the scientific process, and subjectivity of science. The analysis for IKS representations focused on four pillars of IKS which are; indigenous legends and myths, indigenous technology, indigenous knowledge of the natural world, and indigenous social life. It was found that, for the NOS, in all the three textbooks, only the empirical nature of science and observation and inference are represented to a considerable extent and mainly in a naïve and implicit manner. The other investigated tenets are either minimally represented or not represented at all. Representations of IKS in the three textbooks were also found to be very minimal and mainly naïve and implicit. It is concluded the selected science textbooks do not respond well to the NCS mandate of integrating NOS and IKS into mainstream science education. Recommendations for improving integration of NOS and IKS into the school science curriculum are suggested for textbooks authors, curriculum developers and science educators.udKey wordsudnature of science, indigenous knowledge systems, textbooks, natural science, naive, informed, implicit, explicit, positivism, constructivism
机译:这项研究分析了南非三本9级自然科学教科书中自然科学(NOS)和土著知识系统(IKS)的代表。这些教科书是有意从公开市场上出售的十本教科书中选出的,并在南非豪登省的科学教室中使用。分析的目的是确定NOS和IKS的代表程度,并确定这些代表是:天真还是明智;和隐式或显式。教科书的内容分析分别基于Akson,Abd-El-Khalick和Lederman(2000)针对NOS和Ninnes(2000)针对IKS开发的分析框架的改编。对于NOS,分析着重于七个原则。科学是经验性的,观察与推理之间的差异,理论与法律之间的功能和关系,创造力和想象力在科学中的作用,科学知识的初步性,科学过程的社会和文化嵌入性以及科学的主体性。对IKS表示的分析集中于IKS的四个支柱:土著传说和神话,土著技术,自然界的土著知识以及土著社会生活。结果发现,对于NOS,在所有三本教科书中,只有科学的经验性,观察性和推理性在很大程度上得到体现,并且主要是幼稚和隐含的。其他调查原则要么很少代表,要么根本不代表。还发现三本教科书中的IKS表示非常少,主要是幼稚和隐含的。结论是,所选的科学教科书不能很好地满足NCS将NOS和IKS纳入主流科学教育的要求。针对教科书作者,课程开发者和科学教育者,提出了改善NOS和IKS融入学校科学课程的建议。 ud关键字自然科学,本土知识体系,教科书,自然科学,天真,知性,内隐,显性,实证主义,建构主义

著录项

  • 作者

    Moloto Matlhodi Francina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号